I know I harp on the same topics over and over again, but they're relevant because the VCs are in bed with the Democrats. Just look at the Ellen Pao case - who was she not invited to dinner with? Al Gore. Who did the CEO of my last company advise on his presidential campaign? John Kerry. DeBlasio, a Democrat, just spent $10 million of New Yorker taxpayer money to train workers for tech companies, and Obama just spent $100 million of federal money to do the same. Meanwhile, the VCs start at $500k a year and get promoted to $3 million a year, now that Pao has aired out their dirty laundry in a high profile court case.<p>I can't help but feel that this may all be a new corporate structure where the financiers are still in charge, but instead of expectations for corporations to offer real benefits, career progression, R&D budgets, and training of entry level people, we have the perfect excuse to avoid all of that - "we're a startup, and we just can't afford it." I'm not sure it's as healthy as it sounds when you just romanticize entrepeneurship for it's own sake, especially when they make no qualms that taking investor money is part of the goal.
Ugg, this is hard to read. Politics and startups don't mix. I know I can't really make any logical argument about it's negative qualities without being downvoted. I'll just say hopefully some people get a trip to DC to meet the prez.