TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Kim Dotcom Megaupload case falters over sharing Canadian data

49 pointsby fraqedabout 10 years ago

8 comments

wongarsuabout 10 years ago
Hiring one Canadian is prohibitively expensive, so instead they fight a legal battle to be able to send a team of Americans? That seems like a red flag to me. Even computer forensic professionals can't be that much more expensive than police officers and lawyers.
评论 #9374105 未加载
danukerabout 10 years ago
And in the meantime, Megaupload is caught in regulatory limbo, shut down in favor of its competitors&#x27; exponential growth.<p>Guilty until proven innocent.<p>That&#x27;s why many companies try to avoid getting there, by lobbying for OPPOSING major parties, for instance.
评论 #9375080 未加载
joshstrangeabout 10 years ago
&gt; On Jan. 18, 2012, an Ontario judge granted a search warrant to seize 32 servers in Canada — equivalent to the amount of data stored on 100 laptops, according to Megaupload lawyers.<p>Wait what??? Neither servers nor laptops have any sort of &quot;average HD size&quot;. This comparison seems quite stupid. It&#x27;s not only apples and oranges to compare the two but provides no meaningful data at all....
评论 #9374975 未加载
评论 #9374870 未加载
评论 #9375983 未加载
评论 #9374119 未加载
评论 #9374189 未加载
mikelatabout 10 years ago
Just imagine all the tax dollars wasted ruining this guy&#x27;s business.
评论 #9375047 未加载
评论 #9375256 未加载
digitalnealabout 10 years ago
Its before my morning coffee so maybe I am missing the reason but why can&#x27;t it be indexed by Canadians? Is it because its an American case and they are only permitted to hold potential evidence, not assist in the investigation?
评论 #9374979 未加载
评论 #9374415 未加载
评论 #9374462 未加载
评论 #9374342 未加载
评论 #9374554 未加载
评论 #9374196 未加载
mckossabout 10 years ago
Note the journalistic bias - describing Kim Dotcom as &quot;notorious&quot;.
评论 #9374055 未加载
评论 #9374487 未加载
upofadownabout 10 years ago
The site is shut down so the people involved have achieved their goal. I doubt that the defence is claiming that there was no copyrighted material in the users data stores. The case is really about refusal to pursue copyright enforcement. All the prosecution needs to do is drag this out to win.<p>So if you don&#x27;t toe the line all your equipment gets seized. If you ever get it back it will be obsolete. You will also be tied up with legal stuff for a long time. That is the real message being sent here. The facts of the case don&#x27;t matter.
vsobolabout 10 years ago
Why do they need humans looking at files? Can&#x27;t a program be created that scans disk contents and classifies them in whatever way they need it analyzed?
评论 #9373617 未加载
评论 #9374160 未加载