TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

NGINX Open Source: Reflecting Back and Looking Ahead

132 pointsby SkyRocknRollabout 10 years ago

9 comments

MichaelGGabout 10 years ago
Nginx Plus seems like they took a lot of the obvious feature upgrades, some which look fairly easy (remove cached item) and put them in a pay wall. Nothing <i>wrong</i> with that, just feels weird. And the pricing is enough to pay for a Windows license, not that IIS is even close to nginx (it&#x27;s reverse proxy capability is terrible).<p>I&#x27;m sad to hear about JS; I thought the work with Lua was going well and would be a better candidate. Maybe I misunderstand the situation.<p>Nginx is one of those great tech that just makes so much more easy in my life.
评论 #9377554 未加载
评论 #9376820 未加载
评论 #9376811 未加载
评论 #9382927 未加载
rjzzleepabout 10 years ago
i guess tengine is getting more and more relevant then:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;alibaba&#x2F;tengine" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;alibaba&#x2F;tengine</a><p>(though to be fair most work on new protocols seems to be from nginx itself)
myaredabout 10 years ago
I&#x27;ve been digging the last few months of blog posts that nginx has been putting out, especially the articles around microservices. They&#x27;re very well written and have inspired our company to think differently about a few of our applications. When we were offered the opportunity to talk with nginx directly for a private webinar, we were left with a very underwhelming feeling. It may have been the specific sales person, but they couldn&#x27;t explain how nginx&#x27;s paid services could help our company.
评论 #9382532 未加载
xorcistabout 10 years ago
The question that you should always ask before going down an proprietary-add-ons business model is, what are you going to do the day someone develops the same functionality for the open source product, in a fundamentally different way? Are you going to rip out those parts every time you release your proprietary version? Because your customers are paying for those parts to be very stable.
评论 #9377833 未加载
aioprisanabout 10 years ago
td;rd: interesting things will move to the premium version, JS VM to power future versions, pluggable module API coming
评论 #9377565 未加载
fideloperabout 10 years ago
&gt; we’re beginning the implementation of a pluggable module API<p>This is the most exciting for me, as I&#x27;d much rather install from a package than have to re-compile from source.<p>I&#x27;ve figured out how to make that easier in Debian&#x2F;Ubuntu: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;serversforhackers.com&#x2F;compiling-third-party-modules-into-nginx" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;serversforhackers.com&#x2F;compiling-third-party-modules-...</a>, but having a command similar to Apache to enable&#x2F;disable a module will be <i>really</i> nice.
Apofisabout 10 years ago
It&#x27;s annoying that they took SPDY support out of Community and put it into Plus. Want updates? Too bad, you gotta recompile.
评论 #9377435 未加载
评论 #9377244 未加载
评论 #9377640 未加载
dchestabout 10 years ago
Which JavaScript VM are they going to use?
评论 #9377967 未加载
farawayeaabout 10 years ago
No longer using nginx after plus became a product.