TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

How one tweet wiped $8bn off Twitter's value

70 pointsby SimplyUselessabout 10 years ago

14 comments

4kabout 10 years ago
BBC is linkbaiting now?<p>One tweet didn&#x27;t wipe $8bn off its value, the results did. If the results were released next day, it still would have lost value ffs. I feel angry reading through this and realizing it was a waste of time fluff.<p>Say what you will, its evident that HN crowd loves sensationalism more than content, as seen again and again.
评论 #9458611 未加载
评论 #9458588 未加载
评论 #9458616 未加载
salmonellaeaterabout 10 years ago
The salient information:<p><i>Well, it seems that Nasdaq slipped up here after Twitter furnished the exchange with earnings details ahead of time ready for official publication.</i><p>...<p><i>Selerity then made sure that everyone knew about it through Twitter&#x27;s own platform, but it did not break any rules in doing so as the results had already been published and were effectively in the public arena.</i><p><i>&quot;We inadvertently released an early version of their [Twitter&#x27;s] earnings,&quot; Nasdaq said.</i>
评论 #9458532 未加载
pibefisionabout 10 years ago
Everyone critizes how Buzzfeed defines article&#x27;s titles and here it is: BBC using the same tricks to get some extra trafic
评论 #9458323 未加载
评论 #9458370 未加载
评论 #9458311 未加载
binxbollingabout 10 years ago
If Twitter knew this rough patch was coming (albeit not so soon), why did they remove the Discover and Activity tabs from their mobile app? Just anecdotally, I, and everyone I know, spent more time on Twitter because of those two features. Isn&#x27;t driving more engagement and longer time-in-app tied to revenues? Financial considerations aside, why remove those?
评论 #9458426 未加载
评论 #9458380 未加载
评论 #9458511 未加载
评论 #9458338 未加载
venomsnakeabout 10 years ago
If a single tweet wipes $8 bn of your value - you are overvalued. Probably by an order of magnitude ...
评论 #9458465 未加载
评论 #9458439 未加载
评论 #9458525 未加载
评论 #9458410 未加载
评论 #9458528 未加载
DangerousPieabout 10 years ago
If Selerity was clever enough to short the stock before publishing this they probably made a nice chunk of change yesterday...
评论 #9458615 未加载
评论 #9458512 未加载
评论 #9458508 未加载
wdr1about 10 years ago
Mistakes like this are unfortunate, but once made, it&#x27;s shocking that the SEC allows them to them to take the content down.<p>The wishful thinking that it &quot;undoes&quot; the error is understandable, but in reality that&#x27;s not possible, and it really does is restrict access, give unfair access to information and effectively enables select parties to trade on insider information.
heimatauabout 10 years ago
So, I was following this accidental leak on reddit, someone made a really good comment. It goes as follows, regardless of the loss of market cap. <i>Who</i> would&#x27;ve thought that Twitter would be a viable two billion dollar company? Wow. They&#x27;ve achieved a lot. Props to them, even though they have a volatile stock.
bhartzerabout 10 years ago
$8b was wiped off of the value, but personally I think Twitter was over-valued in the first place. So maybe this brings it more into line with what it&#x27;s really worth.
perlgeekabout 10 years ago
Clickbait title. Afaict it was the bad revenue numbers that made the stock fall, not the tweet that carried the news.
评论 #9458449 未加载
myth_busterabout 10 years ago
So what was the technical reason for the gaffe? Was it just someone simply messing up effective from timestamp?
untilHellbannedabout 10 years ago
Not too familiar, is there any way NASDAQ could take a hit for this?
btbuildemabout 10 years ago
Good publicity for Selerity, anyways..
laurentsabbahabout 10 years ago
Shocked this headline isn&#x27;t a sponsored post on my FB newsfeed with an image of the world ending and link to somebogusnewssite dot com