I find this super disappointing. Why select Pocket out of the plethora of other services? Why even take the stance of endorsing <i>any</i> proprietary, probably-for-profit service in Firefox? Arguably, this is even more visible than Yahoo (and previously, Google's) sponsorship.<p>Seems like a compromise of ideals, and it worries me that they must be in dire financial straights to accept possible kickbacks like this.
The corresponding Mozilla press release: <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/06/02/firefox-puts-you-in-control-of-your-online-life/" rel="nofollow">https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/06/02/firefox-puts-you-in...</a>