It's from dozens of Christian sites and forum posts linking to that page and because the search query matches the URL and page title exactly.<p>Google ranks the URL words too high it looks like.<p>Why is this BBC page not in the top 10 results? Is it solely because of the page URL? It has more backlinks and a more trusted domain. <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dino_prog_summary.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/dino_prog...</a><p>This says that the original page has over 17 million backlinks, but that can't be correct: <a href="https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains?target=https%3A%2F%2Fanswersingenesis.org%2Fdinosaurs%2Fwhen-did-dinosaurs-live%2Fwhat-really-happened-to-the-dinosaurs%2F" rel="nofollow">https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/subdomains?target=...</a><p>And it participates in social media a lot: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/domain/answersingenesis.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/domain/answersingenesis.org</a><p>Should Google decrease the "worth" of that domain? If there is content that has a high SEO rating but is factually incorrect, does that deserve to be lower on the search results listing?<p>Should Google display different cards based on the user? Someone which Google determines is highly religious verses not religious would get different cards?<p>Update: Oh no, something needs to be done, this site is disgusting: <a href="https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/billions-of-people-in-thousands-of-years/" rel="nofollow">https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-against-evolution/bill...</a>