TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Rails Deployment Stacks

31 pointsby luckystrikeover 15 years ago

4 comments

bradgesslerover 15 years ago
I clicked through to this expecting it to be about Capistrano vs. Chef vs. [...], but the post is really about nginx vs. Apache vs. [...].<p>A more appropriate title might be, "Comparison of Rails Production Environments"
评论 #970568 未加载
atamboover 15 years ago
When it comes down to it for rails deployment your going to maximize the number of workers you have based on the amount of available memory. I'd like to see a test where they set the number of workers equal to the amount that fit within 512MB's of ram or something similar. I'd say using passenger + ree you'd be able to double or triple the number of workers for the same amount of memory and blow the rest of the stacks out of the water.
评论 #971227 未加载
评论 #970685 未加载
heyrhettover 15 years ago
I've never heard ofr webroar before, but I'm not surprised that the people who wrote it can set it up better than they can set up passenger.<p>At least the bias is transparent, but I can't take benchmarks directly from the creator of any piece of software too seriously.
lpgauthover 15 years ago
I'd love to see some numbers for nginx + passenger.
评论 #973915 未加载