TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The first mass chlorination of a city’s water supply

53 pointsby ghoshalmost 10 years ago

6 comments

clordalmost 10 years ago
With what we know now about beneficial bacteria, I wonder if, in addition to the pathogens, we&#x27;re killing probiotics? And perhaps the lack of exposure to mild bacteria mean we&#x27;re more susceptible to immune diseases?<p>Of course getting rid of the pathogens is a great thing, but perhaps chlorination plays a role in causing some modern problems that are related to the immune system and the gut biome? Anyone have links to studies done on this topic?
评论 #9819929 未加载
评论 #9820442 未加载
评论 #9819964 未加载
评论 #9820596 未加载
评论 #9820844 未加载
timralmost 10 years ago
Note what <i>didn&#x27;t</i> happen here: he didn&#x27;t create a startup company to deliver Luxury Water to rich people. He didn&#x27;t patent the idea, and attempt to collect royalties. He didn&#x27;t discover the idea while attempting to get rich from some tangentially related business.<p>Contrary to popular narrative, many of the technologies that make our lives <i>livable</i> came about because dedicated people devoted themselves directly to solving some important problem, not serendipitously while pursuing personal wealth.
评论 #9821630 未加载
评论 #9820904 未加载
评论 #9820796 未加载
alricbalmost 10 years ago
And what can happen if the people responsible for a water supply screw up: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Walkerton_E._coli_outbreak" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Walkerton_E._coli_outbreak</a> <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca&#x2F;english&#x2F;about&#x2F;pubs&#x2F;walkerton&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca&#x2F;english&#x2F;about&#x2F;pubs&#x2F;...</a>
评论 #9819808 未加载
评论 #9820093 未加载
tomjen3almost 10 years ago
Today he would be treated as a terrorist, which would probably have been for the best. In this case it worked, but how many mad people are so convinced of their own brilliance that they will simply think the public will adore them when they see it works?
评论 #9820951 未加载
Retricalmost 10 years ago
That&#x27;s not the orginal title. <i>How One Man Poisoned a City’s Water Supply (and Saved Millions of Children’s Lives in the Process)</i>
评论 #9820046 未加载
mchermalmost 10 years ago
Is this the historical equivalent of Uber ignoring legal constraints in hopes of later finding a work-around or a change in the law?
评论 #9819628 未加载