<a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/CamelsandRubberDuckies.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/CamelsandRubberDuckie...</a><p>"Bad Idea #1: Site Licenses.<p>The opposite of segmentation, really. I have certain competitors that do this: they charge small customers per-user but then there's a "unlimited" license at a fixed price. This is nutty, because you're giving the biggest price break precisely to the largest customers, the ones who would be willing to pay you the most money. Do you really want IBM to buy your software for their 400,000 employees and pay you $2000? Hmm?<p>As soon as you have an "unlimited" price, you are instantly giving a gigantic gift of consumer surplus to the least price-sensitive customers who should have been the cash cows of your business."<p>On the other hand, consumers massively prefer unmetered services as it avoids the cognitive tax of figuring out variable pricing.<p>AT&T is in a weird position here as these two forces are almost exactly balanced. It can either choose to start metering now and then flip flop a couple of years later or tough it out until provisioning bandwidth becomes cheap enough to not meter. Neither of these is an especially appealing solution.
Pretty on point.<p>"There was this weird lump in my throat, this tightness in my chest. I had this vision of the future — a ruined empire, run by number crunchers, squalid and stupid and puffed up with phony patriotism, settling for a long slow decline."
Pretty funny. I lol'ed the whole way through.<p>All joke aside though, what kind of company makes a move like that to f*ck their early adopters? That can't be good for business, not matter WHAT the numbers look like.