TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Would you ever pay to use a search engine?

9 pointsby tima101almost 10 years ago
HI All, inspired by debate here: https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9960730<p>There are multiple ways to monetize website&#x27;s traffic: 1) advertise, 2) make users subscribe, 3) hybrid (ads for non-paying users), 4) sell or upsell goods to the users.<p>Two questions:<p>1) Will you pay to Google $2.50&#x2F;mo to remove ads (both tagged and hidden) 2) Will you pay to search engine which delivers more relevant results then Google and has no ads (same $2.50&#x2F;mo)?<p>Please explain why. Thanks!

6 comments

klyburkealmost 10 years ago
There are services for people to do online research for you (e.g. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wonderlib.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wonderlib.com&#x2F;</a>), so I think it&#x27;s fair to pay for a search engine that directly gives you highly relevant (and as you suggest, human-curated) results.
评论 #9964328 未加载
stephengilliealmost 10 years ago
Hi<p>You missed a 5th method, another (very annoying) hybrid: Advertise to everyone, <i>maybe</i> less to subscribers. The New Yorker is known for this model, among others.<p>To answer your poll (clarifying questions inline):<p>1. I would be willing to pay Google $30&#x2F;year to opt-out of AdSense.<p>-Would I have to be logged in for the opt-out to work?<p>2. I would be willing to pay a Google competitor the same $30&#x2F;year to have advertising-free results of equivalent quality.<p>-Where do you find another search engine whose results are <i>more</i> relevant? Do you mean having &quot;non-personalized&quot; results by default?
评论 #9963543 未加载
anonyfoxalmost 10 years ago
I&#x27;d pay 10€&#x2F;month for a google alternative. It should rank resources based on relevancy, not mixed up with any advertising or business-political reasons. And no filter bubble please (opt-out?).
评论 #9963607 未加载
betenoirealmost 10 years ago
I dunno. I hate the idea of personalized ads for privacy reasons... but at the same time, if ads are inevitable, why not ones I&#x27;m interested in?<p>As for search results, a mix of logged-in-searches for usual topics and incognito for more unbiased results works well enough for me.
评论 #9968938 未加载
tima101almost 10 years ago
URL from the debate thread: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;veekaybee.github.io&#x2F;who-is-doing-this-to-my-internet&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;veekaybee.github.io&#x2F;who-is-doing-this-to-my-internet&#x2F;</a>
panglottalmost 10 years ago
It would be hard to get this to consumers, but plenty of other search engines have a non-advertising business model. ProQuest and EBSCO get their money from libraries and institutions, for example.
评论 #9963901 未加载