TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

No Surprises (2009)

67 pointsby marcolinuxalmost 10 years ago

14 comments

criley2almost 10 years ago
Does &quot;No Surprises&quot; mean I won&#x27;t find unwanted Firefox extensions pre-installed by Mozilla that are impossible to remove and only serve to reduce privacy by opening up new unwanted avenues to access my input and broadcast it over third party non-mozilla private networks? Shouldn&#x27;t I at least be able to opt-out of a private video service running on a third party server that I have no terms of use or privacy policy covering?<p>&quot;All changes must be ‘opt-in’, meaning the user must take non-default action to enact the change.&quot;<p>Right, just like I &quot;opt-ed&quot; in to Firefox Hello.<p>I can&#x27;t even &quot;opt out&quot; of Firefox Hello!<p>&quot;Uninstalling the add-on restores the user’s original settings if they were changed.<p>I wish. Just goes to show that they&#x27;re pushing an uneven playing field where Firefox Extensions are auto-installed, can&#x27;t be removed, and can break all the rules. But hey, at least everyone ELSE can&#x27;t break all the rules.<p>Funny that they won&#x27;t even apply this philosophy to their own products and services that they are forcing into user installations without an opt-in or opt-out.
评论 #9982492 未加载
评论 #9982113 未加载
Tepixalmost 10 years ago
I consider the way they hid the &quot;block third party cookies&quot; option a surprise. Mozilla is so dependent on Google and other companies&#x27; money, they can&#x27;t be completely trusted to offer the best privacy out of the box.<p>The fact that Safari has 3rd party cookies disabled by default whereas Firefox hasn&#x27;t... is both telling and sad.
评论 #9981945 未加载
评论 #9981814 未加载
AdmiralAsshatalmost 10 years ago
Does this mean they&#x27;ll be rolling back the Pocket integration?
评论 #9981629 未加载
评论 #9981951 未加载
评论 #9981330 未加载
评论 #9981503 未加载
评论 #9981656 未加载
mahousealmost 10 years ago
(2009)
评论 #9981322 未加载
spectoalmost 10 years ago
I guess this is a quip against Mozilla adding the 3rd party functionality?
评论 #9981295 未加载
l1nalmost 10 years ago
Might be better to change the link to the official policy: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;Add-ons&#x2F;AMO&#x2F;Policy&#x2F;Reviews#section-defaults" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developer.mozilla.org&#x2F;en-US&#x2F;Add-ons&#x2F;AMO&#x2F;Policy&#x2F;Revie...</a>
feldalmost 10 years ago
Sounds like FreeBSD&#x27;s POLA<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.freebsd.org&#x2F;doc&#x2F;en_US.ISO8859-1&#x2F;books&#x2F;handbook&#x2F;freebsd-glossary.html#pola-glossary" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.freebsd.org&#x2F;doc&#x2F;en_US.ISO8859-1&#x2F;books&#x2F;handbook&#x2F;f...</a>
mrweaselalmost 10 years ago
So Googles Safe Browsing will finally be opt-in?
评论 #9981539 未加载
emddudleyalmost 10 years ago
This is from 2009.
vdaniukalmost 10 years ago
This derogatory treatment of Mozilla by hivemind consensus emerging from opinions of a vocal minority is a curious phenomena and a indicator of the increasing ideological rift in open source community. It can be roughly summarized as a conflict between deontological and consequentialist ethics. User privacy, &quot;meritocracy&quot;, freedom from DRM&#x2F;EME, etc above all else vs strategical trade-offs that strengthen competitive positions against Chrome, Edge and Safari.
评论 #9984747 未加载
arca_voragoalmost 10 years ago
So does that mean the WebRTC issues will be made visible to the average user?
eulealmost 10 years ago
I was pretty surprised when tabs suddenly were on the top.
nojaalmost 10 years ago
Well, I didn&#x27;t expect that.
LeoNatan25almost 10 years ago
Is that a surprise in your pocket, or are you just happy to throw away my privacy?
评论 #9981485 未加载