TE
TechEcho
AccueilTop 24hRécentsMeilleursQuestionsPrésentationsEmplois
GitHubTwitter
Accueil

TechEcho

Une plateforme d'actualités technologiques construite avec Next.js, fournissant des nouvelles et discussions technologiques mondiales.

GitHubTwitter

Accueil

AccueilRécentsMeilleursQuestionsPrésentationsEmplois

Ressources

HackerNews APIHackerNews OriginalNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. Tous droits réservés.

Using NASA’s SMAP satellite to detect L-band interference

298 pointspar c16il y a environ 21 heures

14 comments

jjwisemanil y a environ 11 heures
I liked this overview map they posted a few days ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;HamWa07&#x2F;status&#x2F;1919763145536463222" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;HamWa07&#x2F;status&#x2F;1919763145536463222</a><p>giammaiot2 on twitter has a long history of trying to use science sensors to detect intentional RF interference, e.g. this post with a map from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) looking at 7 GHz: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;giammaiot2&#x2F;status&#x2F;1919493425100988490" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;giammaiot2&#x2F;status&#x2F;1919493425100988490</a><p>Or this thread from 2023 looking at SMAP: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;giammaiot2&#x2F;status&#x2F;1770815247772729539" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;x.com&#x2F;giammaiot2&#x2F;status&#x2F;1770815247772729539</a>
评论 #43929930 未加载
dakril y a environ 12 heures
A wonderful example of the useful, sometimes unintentional secondary effects of doing science. SMAP as a mission is firmly in the Earth science category, so very much in the crosshairs of the current administration. The data is used for Earth science and climate research and has many agricultural and water management applications.<p>For example, water management districts can tell if the local soil can accommodate the water from an upcoming storm or if the water will stay on the surface and cause flooding.
drmpegil y a environ 11 heures
The specific allocation is 1400 to 1427 MHz. It is reserved for radio astronomy (the hydrogen line is at 1420.4 MHz), passive (receive only) Earth exploration satellites and passive space research.<p>In the US, 1240 to 1400 MHz is allocated to radar. GNSS downlinks at 1240 to 1300 MHZ are not protected in the US.
bob1029il y a environ 19 heures
Iridium satellites can communicate with ground stations on L-band.<p>This band is extremely useful if you&#x27;re stuck on a ship in the middle of a typhoon and need to get some help.
评论 #43925670 未加载
评论 #43925112 未加载
NoSaltil y a environ 16 heures
His GitHub site mentions: <i>&quot;This script processes NASA SMAP L1B .h5 data files&quot;</i>, but he doesn&#x27;t say how he obtains these data files. Is he using an API, or is he using something like an RTL-SDR to pull the data directly?
评论 #43926679 未加载
评论 #43926003 未加载
mellow_observeril y a environ 18 heures
What do the jamming locations within Russia correspond to? You would think these are important places that require drone protection, but I could not quickly discover what is so important in these places.<p>For instance, the bright spot to the north west of Moscow seems to fall somewhere in or close to Zavidovo National Park. Is there something important there? There&#x27;s nearby air bases Migalovo and Klin, but both seem too far from the center.
评论 #43926484 未加载
评论 #43925105 未加载
评论 #43929894 未加载
o_1il y a environ 19 heures
Very awesome. Never knew about L-band.
kevin_thibedeauil y a environ 10 heures
Crimea is still part of Ukraine. That can&#x27;t change until a peace treaty settles the dispute.
logiczilleril y a environ 16 heures
This is brilliant. What other bands can we observe like this?
评论 #43927700 未加载
Alex-Programsil y a environ 13 heures
```In a modern conflict zone, jamming L-band means blinding drones, degrading targeting, and cutting off ISR. It’s not accidental. It’s deliberate.<p>The international treaties that say “don’t transmit here”? Those don’t matter much when you’re trying to survive a drone swarm.```<p>LLM prose, and it&#x27;s not the only section that stands out. It&#x27;s an informative article, so I don&#x27;t mind it as much, but I think it&#x27;s a shame people don&#x27;t write things themselves anymore.
评论 #43928580 未加载
评论 #43928240 未加载
评论 #43927635 未加载
nannail y a environ 19 heures
Anyone care to explain in layman&#x27;s terms what this is about?
评论 #43924948 未加载
评论 #43924937 未加载
评论 #43924936 未加载
x0il y a environ 19 heures
Brilliant idea to check out this satellite. Are there any others that receive interesting frequencies? (thinking under 6GHz)
评论 #43925030 未加载
g4zjil y a environ 17 heures
Wouldn&#x27;t NASA then almost certainly be aware of this as well?
评论 #43925727 未加载
评论 #43928648 未加载
4adil y a environ 19 heures
Doesn&#x27;t really answer the question of <i>why</i> does the military use the L-band. Whether it&#x27;s jammed or not is immaterial (of course they are going to jam it if it has military use), but what specific attributes makes L-band useful for the military?
评论 #43925078 未加载
评论 #43924931 未加载
评论 #43924929 未加载
评论 #43925832 未加载