TE
テックエコー
ホーム24時間トップ最新ベスト質問ショー求人
GitHubTwitter
ホーム

テックエコー

Next.jsで構築されたテクノロジーニュースプラットフォームで、グローバルなテクノロジーニュースとディスカッションを提供します。

GitHubTwitter

ホーム

ホーム最新ベスト質問ショー求人

リソース

HackerNews APIオリジナルHackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 テックエコー. すべての権利を保有。

Progress toward fusion energy gain as measured against the Lawson criteria

123 ポイント投稿者: sam約7時間前

8 comments

edran約5時間前
This is a great update! I hope the authors continue publishing new versions of their plots as the community builds up towards facility gain. It&#x27;s hard to keep track of all the experiments going on around the world, and normalizing all the results into the same plot space (even wrt. just triple product &#x2F; Lawson criteria) is actually tricky for various reasons and takes dedicated time.<p>Somewhat relevant, folks here might also be interested in a whitepaper we recently put up on arXiv that describes what we are doing at Pacific Fusion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2504.10680" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;2504.10680</a><p>Section 1 in particular gives some extra high-level context that might be useful to have while reading Sam and Scott&#x27;s update, and the rest of the paper should also be a good introduction to the various subsystems that make up a high-yield fusion demonstration system (albeit focused on pulser-driven inertial fusion).
CGMthrowaway約3時間前
I heard that NIF was never intended to be a power plant, not even a prototype of one. It&#x27;s primarily a nuclear weapon research program. For a power plant you would need much more efficient lasers, you would need a much larger gain in the capsules, you would need lasers that can do many shots per second, some automated reloading system for the capsules, and you would need a heat to electricity conversion system around the fusion spot (which will have an efficiency of ~1&#x2F;3 or so).<p>Any truth to that?
评论 #43930122 未加载
评论 #43931330 未加载
评论 #43931695 未加载
评论 #43931035 未加载
评论 #43930620 未加载
dale_glass約2時間前
It should be noted that &quot;breakeven&quot; is often misleading.<p>There&#x27;s &quot;breakeven&quot; as in &quot;the reaction produces more energy than put into it&quot;, and there&#x27;s breakeven as in &quot;the entire reactor system produces more energy than put into it&quot;, which isn&#x27;t quite the same thing.
评论 #43931782 未加载
gene-h約1時間前
This will probably need to be updated soon. There are rumors NIF recently achieved a gain of ~4.4 and ~10% fuel burn up. Being able to ignite more fuel is notable in and of itself.
actinium226約5時間前
Why is the last plot basically empty between 2000 and 2020? I understand that NIF was probably being built during that time, but were there no significant tokamak experiments in that time?
评论 #43929243 未加载
评论 #43928568 未加载
评论 #43929013 未加载
评论 #43928525 未加载
NervousRing約1時間前
I&#x27;ve heard of q-plasma and q-total. What is q-science?
评论 #43931816 未加载
UltraSane約2時間前
The money being spent on fusion should be being spent building next generation fission power plants and liquid salt reactors.
评论 #43930742 未加载
评论 #43930715 未加载
arghandugh約5時間前
Maybe someday we’ll finally achieve the ultimate dream: an extremely expensive nuclear power plant that needs vast amounts of coolant water and leaves radioactive waste behind.
评论 #43930464 未加载
评论 #43929626 未加载
评论 #43930211 未加载