TE
테크에코
홈24시간 인기최신베스트질문쇼채용
GitHubTwitter
홈

테크에코

Next.js로 구축된 기술 뉴스 플랫폼으로 글로벌 기술 뉴스와 토론을 제공합니다.

GitHubTwitter

홈

홈최신베스트질문쇼채용

리소스

HackerNews API원본 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 테크에코. 모든 권리 보유.

Imagineers defend new Walt Disney robot

45 포인트작성자: rmason3일 전

10 comments

Isamu약 9시간 전
&gt;Yet soon a social media missive critical of the attraction from Walt&#x27;s granddaughter would go viral. It raised anew ethical questions that often surround any project attempting to capture the dead via technology, be it holographic representations of performers or digitally re-created cinematic animations, namely debates surrounding the wishes of the deceased and whether such creations are exploitative.<p>Exactly the same reaction happened when Disney developed the first Abraham Lincoln animatronic for the New York World’s Fair in the 1960’s.
评论 #43927463 未加载
评论 #43927247 未加载
评论 #43927373 未加载
评论 #43928059 未加载
评论 #43927137 未加载
aetherson약 8시간 전
Surely if there is one person in history who we would be pretty sure would be thrilled to have a posthumous animatronic version of himself, it is Walt Disney.
krunck약 9시간 전
Can&#x27;t help thinking about the Kier Eagan animatronic statue in Severance.
评论 #43927936 未加载
schlauerfox약 9시간 전
in the 80s AVG built a robotic Andy Warhol but he was enthused about it. Abraham lincoln is an American icon. Not sure someone who still has family in living memory is the same category despite being a sort of icon for a big corporation and a big emerging ethical concern of the 21st century seems to be bodily autonomy and consent. I see a lot of AI generated &#x27;animated&#x27; photos, of the living and the dead. I tend to see a lot of people ignore someone&#x27;s consent like they ignore media piracy, with a disinterested immoral hand-wave.
评论 #43927293 未加载
评论 #43927178 未加载
havblue약 8시간 전
The problem I see with this is just the lack of originality. Disneyland originally focused on subjects like early America, the frontier or the future. This robot is about the guy who built a company that focused on that. It&#x27;s very self referential. Couldn&#x27;t they do something new like a Louis Armstrong robot that plays trumpet?
评论 #43929844 未加载
RajT88약 8시간 전
I have seen this one before. The robot ends up trying to to eat Elian Gonzalez.
amiga386약 8시간 전
So Robot Chicken wasn&#x27;t lying to me!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LymbI4Dxj4c" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LymbI4Dxj4c</a>
Electricniko약 7시간 전
Most of Disney&#x27;s works are protected by IP law, but Disney himself is public domain.
n3storm약 6시간 전
Wait what? yahoo.com exists? XD
lawlessone약 9시간 전
It&#x27;s cute now, but will people like it so much when it adopts Walt&#x27;s uh... views on things...?
评论 #43927752 未加载