TE
테크에코
홈24시간 인기최신베스트질문쇼채용
GitHubTwitter
홈

테크에코

Next.js로 구축된 기술 뉴스 플랫폼으로 글로벌 기술 뉴스와 토론을 제공합니다.

GitHubTwitter

홈

홈최신베스트질문쇼채용

리소스

HackerNews API원본 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 테크에코. 모든 권리 보유.

Mass spectrometry method identifies pathogens within minutes instead of days

126 포인트작성자: pseudolus2일 전

6 comments

pbmonster약 17시간 전
Would be interesting how much resolution they need for the diagnosis to be reliable.<p>Because high resolution mass spectrometers cost millions of dollars, and &quot;minutes&quot; for a diagnosis can mean that one spectrometer can only run 3 samples per hour - or 72 per day.<p>And while a research university can afford a million dollar spectrometer (and the grad students that run it), even a small hospital will create 72 bacterial swaps per hour - while absolutely not having the money to get 10 spectrometers with the corresponding technicians.<p>And the incumbent&#x2F;competitor - standard bacterial cultures - is cheap!
评论 #43928492 未加载
评论 #43924079 未加载
评论 #43924679 未加载
评论 #43927947 未加载
评论 #43925411 未加载
评论 #43929312 未加载
rurban약 17시간 전
Mass spectromity is a bit expensive. My company can detect a common plant virus reliable with multi-spectral imaging only. Normal hires B&#x2F;W cameras. 10 days before visible symptoms. SpexAI.com<p>Only vision scales. We did mass spectromity in Formula 1 because we had the money and it doesn&#x27;t need to scale.
评论 #43924395 未加载
评论 #43924394 未加载
评论 #43924595 未加载
JR1427약 16시간 전
You can identify quite a few pathogens with Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. I think the machines for that are smaller and cheaper than mass spec machines.<p>see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC5631018&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&#x2F;articles&#x2F;PMC5631018&#x2F;</a> , and this company that is commercialising it <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;microbira.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;microbira.com&#x2F;</a>
snalty약 13시간 전
This is cool, but I still see sequencing and metagenomics as being the gold standard going forward.
评论 #43925443 未加载
评论 #43926565 未加载
Inuit약 6시간 전
I wonder how much resolution they need for diagnosis...
timetobuild약 18시간 전
Super interesting! But mass spectrometry is an old method, why just now?
评论 #43923968 未加载
评论 #43923972 未加载
评论 #43923930 未加载
评论 #43923913 未加载