TE
테크에코
홈24시간 인기최신베스트질문쇼채용
GitHubTwitter
홈

테크에코

Next.js로 구축된 기술 뉴스 플랫폼으로 글로벌 기술 뉴스와 토론을 제공합니다.

GitHubTwitter

홈

홈최신베스트질문쇼채용

리소스

HackerNews API원본 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 테크에코. 모든 권리 보유.

AI focused on brain regions recreates what you're looking at (2024)

53 포인트작성자: openquery2일 전

8 comments

neonate2일 전
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;650Az" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;650Az</a>
Animats약 6시간 전
The paper, at least as shown here, [1] is vague about which results came from implanted electrodes and which came from functional MRI data. Functional MRI data is showing blood flow. It&#x27;s like looking at an IC with a thermal imager and trying to figure out what it is doing.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;650Az" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;650Az</a>
评论 #43931378 未加载
评论 #43930384 未加载
aitchnyu1일 전
I want to see a cats POV when its startled by a cucumber (Youtube has lots of examples). A theory is that part of the brain mistook it for a snake. Also research on &quot;constant bearing, decreasing range (CBDR)&quot; where drivers may not notice another car&#x2F;cycle in a perfectly clear crossroads till its too late.&#x27;
评论 #43914634 未加载
averageRoyalty2일 전
Maybe I missed this, but isn&#x27;t the underlying concept here big news?<p>Am I understanding this right? It seems that by reading areas of the brain, a machine can effectively act as a rendering engine with knowledge on colour, brightness etc per pixel based on an image the person is seeing? And AI is being used to help because this method is lossy?<p>This seems huge, is there other terminology around this I can kagi to understand more?
评论 #43932750 未加载
评论 #43928468 未加载
评论 #43910513 未加载
评论 #43929485 未加载
abeppu약 6시간 전
I think it would be interesting to know if the viewer&#x27;s familiarity with the object informs how accurate the reconstruction is. This shows presumably lab-raised macaques looking at boats and tarantulas and goldfish -- and that&#x27;s cool. But presumably a macaque especially whose life has been indoors in confinement has no mental concepts for these things, so they&#x27;re basically seeing still images of unfamiliar objects. If the animal has e.g. some favorite toys, or has eaten a range of foods, do they perceive these things with a higher detail and fidelity?
smusamashah약 6시간 전
It reminds of this research where faces monkey&#x27;s were seeing were recreated almost identically.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;science-environment-40131242" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;science-environment-40131242</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cell.com&#x2F;cell&#x2F;fulltext&#x2F;S0092-8674(17)30538-X" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cell.com&#x2F;cell&#x2F;fulltext&#x2F;S0092-8674(17)30538-X</a>
cheschire2일 전
I hope one day we can turn this on for coma patients and see if they&#x27;re dreaming or otherwise processing the world.
评论 #43930392 未加载
EasyMarion약 6시간 전
Big jump when we go from decoding what you’re seeing to what you’re thinking.
评论 #43932262 未加载
评论 #43931670 未加载