TE
테크에코
홈24시간 인기최신베스트질문쇼채용
GitHubTwitter
홈

테크에코

Next.js로 구축된 기술 뉴스 플랫폼으로 글로벌 기술 뉴스와 토론을 제공합니다.

GitHubTwitter

홈

홈최신베스트질문쇼채용

리소스

HackerNews API원본 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 테크에코. 모든 권리 보유.

Ask HN: Theory to industry: where do academics fit in?

2 포인트작성자: doubledamio1일 전
I&#x27;m a young researcher with a background in abstract physics and mathematics, specializing in areas like probability theory, spectral analysis, network theory, and statistical&#x2F;quantum mechanics.<p>I&#x27;m considering transitioning to industry, but my coding experience is limited to basic Python. I’m concerned that, with a strong theoretical background but limited engineering skills, I might struggle to find a good fit. Additionally, with the tightening job market, the abundance of remote talent, and the rise of tools like Copilot, I’m wondering how these factors might impact my prospects.<p>For those who’ve made a similar transition—or who have hired people with this kind of background—how did it go? What roles or paths have worked best for you?

3 comments

gus_massa약 19시간 전
I can&#x27;t guaranty it helps, but learn more python ans &quot;pandas&quot;.
评论 #43924291 未加载
revskill약 16시간 전
It is hard. Python teaches u bad engineering practices.
bell-cot1일 전
Question: Are you assuming that &quot;transitioning to industry&quot; means writing code?<p>Observation: Your background sounds fairly similar to that of Richard Feynman. Who was famously involved in the design of the <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Connection_machine" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Connection_machine</a> . (Also - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;longnow.org&#x2F;essays&#x2F;richard-feynman-connection-machine&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;longnow.org&#x2F;essays&#x2F;richard-feynman-connection-machin...</a> )
评论 #43924244 未加载