When vetting how useful answers are, I and most reasonably intelligent people always pay most attention to the answers that are negative because you typically learn something that helps you better able to approach the problem even if it doesn't solve the problem which you are intending to solve.<p>Looking over this post, there's a problem here. Where are the posts that disagree? That are negative but provide constructive criticism, the very thing that provides value.<p>I see 62 replies here, and this isn't a new question, and there are many caveats which easily come to my mind when learning languages, and yet no ones saying a thing. It begs some serious questions about the environment you are asking in.<p>OP, I would suggest that before wasting your time listening to yes-people, you need some not-so-nice answers for perspective if you really want to solve that problem in an expedient way.<p>That should necessarily include can AI solve that problem for you really? What are the risks of learning language improperly in a professional environment where reputation is important? What are the risks of improperly conveying meaning you didn't intend?, and so forth; you get the gist of the line of questions you should naturally come up with when seeking the truth of things.<p>I'm reminded of all the Japanese anime fans that pick up phrases without understanding the meaning, which is what you are learning to convey when you learn a langauge: like men using watashi (instead of boku), using improper honorifics (-kun, -sama, diajo, aniki), and other aspects that while cute in an entertainment show reflect very poorly on the person if conveyed in reality.