I thought someone was going to make a point about Turing completeness or undecidability. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undecidable_problem" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undecidable_problem</a> Instead we get this incoherent mess: "You can’t predict whether the stock market will go up or down because you can’t compute it.... You could have all the computer chips ever in the world and you won’t create a consciousness." As if predicting the future was relevant to creating consciousness, or if modelling millions of specific brains involved in the stock market was equivalent to creating a single consciousness.