Scott Aaronson: hopefully my last D-Wave post ever

I have been following Scott's site for several years. He is at the top of his field, one of the most qualified quantum computing theorists. Sometimes his sarcasm is juvenile and falls flat, but this post is classic. Yes you would have had to been following along to appreciate it. And it would help to know D-wave at one point actively recruited Scott.If you want to know whether or not quantum computation is taking place, this is your man.<p>I highly recommend reading further on his site, including his papers and lecture notes. I especially recommend his lecture notes "Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science" <a href="http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp08/6.080/materials.html" rel="nofollow">http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp08/6.080/materials.html</a> and "Quantum Computing Since Democritus" <a href="http://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/</a><p>Enjoy.

If you are interested in more of the background, Scott provied this link to his previous posts that touch on D-wave <a href="http://scottaaronson.com/blog/?cat=20" rel="nofollow">http://scottaaronson.com/blog/?cat=20</a><p>A commentor to the most recent post points to this rebuttal <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pontiff/2009/12/in_defense_of_d-wave.php" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/pontiff/2009/12/in_defense_of_d-wave...</a><p>But it all boils down to this, as Scott replies in the comments "...the elephant that’s missing from the room, namely the evidence for coherence and multi-qubit entanglement. Without that, the car never leaves the garage. So, yes, write an unbiased review of the leather seats, but don’t pass over in silence the fact that nobody’s seen the engine."<p>It's possible to build in hardware an engine that will efficiently compute a particular class of problem. It may even be useful. That does not make it a quantum computer.

Fun D-Wave fact: They employ more lawyers than scientists.

"Keep in mind that we’re delivering a product—serving our customers, by solving the 4-by-4 Sudoku puzzles they rely on to keep their businesses running."<p>Brillant!

This post makes the assumption that one has been following this drama for a long time in detail. I know there was a bit of controversy around D-Wave a long while back, but that's faded from memory now. The Google post brought them back into memory, but I found it hard to make it past the first few back-and-forths in Scott's post.<p>Can someone clarify what the situation is here without the "socratic-dramatic"? :)