TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Jet.com Runs into Turbulence with Retailers

28 点作者 r0h1n将近 10 年前

6 条评论

HelloThereSir将近 10 年前
I wouldn&#x27;t associate with them either when they can&#x27;t mitigate basic SQL injection:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jet.com&#x2F;search?term=%27%20OR%201*1=1*1%27" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jet.com&#x2F;search?term=%27%20OR%201*1=1*1%27</a>
评论 #10023019 未加载
评论 #10023424 未加载
评论 #10023044 未加载
评论 #10022856 未加载
评论 #10022555 未加载
wintom将近 10 年前
Jet is trying to save its customers money by not making a profit on the items they sell and offering all kinds of discounts from the commission they would have made all the way to the supply chain cost and passing all of that to the customer.<p>It&#x27;s not surprising that this model clashes with retailers they are not in the business of saving people money and they certainly see the disruption this will cause and the efficiencies it will force on them. They will have to get efficient to compete if this takes off.
评论 #10022893 未加载
评论 #10022900 未加载
评论 #10023193 未加载
fahim305将近 10 年前
Jet&#x27;s major value proposition was that it was supposed to be an attractive alternative option to Amazon for the Retailers and CPG companies. In the short run, that customer is probably more important than the end customer (similar to Airbnb initially with hosts vs. end users) because if they don&#x27;t have the faith of the Retailers&#x2F;CPGers, than this model fails very quickly
noer将近 10 年前
That particular link has a paywall.
评论 #10022481 未加载
评论 #10023204 未加载
pbreit将近 10 年前
On one hand, it seems odd to complain about people driving sales of your stuff. On the other, is this really Jet&#x27;s grand strategy?
chkuendig将近 10 年前
So they are giving out cashback rewards for purchases on unaffiliated online shops?<p>Sounds like selling at a loss but making it up on volume is back.