TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Warp speed travel is theoretically possible, says astrophysicist

6 点作者 chris-at将近 10 年前

2 条评论

zamalek将近 10 年前
Interestingly a short while back White&#x27;s lab did notice a statistically relevant effect regarding one of their candidate warping devices. However, they aren&#x27;t ready to make any conclusions about the effect that they saw - so far as I understand it&#x27;s merely a very weak correlation right now. Something interesting, but nobody should get their hopes up.<p>Either way I seriously recommend some thorough Googling about this subject as that article is unbelievably out of date.<p><i>I play Elite: Dangerous once in a while and one thing that game really teaches you is that even &#x27;c&#x27; is really slow in astronomical terms. You start to realize that for space colonization to become truly viable we&#x27;d have to hope for some real analog of &quot;hyperspace,&quot; as &quot;warp&quot; simply won&#x27;t cut it in the long run.</i>
评论 #10078528 未加载
rootbear将近 10 年前
The article is badly edited, speaking of both &quot;negative density energy&quot; and &quot;negative energy density&quot;, when the latter is what was meant.<p>Even though, as I understand it, General Relativity doesn&#x27;t forbid FTL explicitly, it doesn&#x27;t get you out of the causality problems of FTL. At least, I&#x27;ve never seen an explanation of a &quot;warp&quot; style FTL method that doesn&#x27;t allow for causality violation. I&#x27;m all ears, if someone wants to convince me that warp drives can&#x27;t violate causality.
评论 #10079288 未加载