TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Editing humanity

40 点作者 jeo1234将近 10 年前

8 条评论

redthrowaway将近 10 年前
&gt;But here, too, the right approach is to be cautiously liberal: the burden is on society to justify when and why it is wrong to edit the genome.<p>I think this sentiment hits the right note. I am wholly unpersuaded by moral arguments about &quot;playing God&quot;. We&#x27;ve been doing that for our entire existence. Quite successfully, thank you very much.<p>But tinkering with our genome and that of our children <i>does</i> present ethical quandaries that need to be discussed and resolved. By allowing by default except where there is a compelling objection, we can both avoid the majority of the negative consequences while embracing the real positives that gene modification will bring.
评论 #10093458 未加载
评论 #10094264 未加载
评论 #10093357 未加载
Mz将近 10 年前
<i>Deaf parents may prefer their offspring to be deaf too, say; pushy parents might want to boost their children’s intelligence at all costs, even if doing so affects their personalities in other ways.</i><p>I have read enough to know that certain serious genetic disorders tend to correlate to high IQ. So, yeah, this is very much a two-edged sword situation. It may not be possible to just select for all &quot;positive&quot; qualities.<p>My concern is not exactly ethics per se. My concern is that genes are complicated and my suspicion is we aren&#x27;t as clever as we think we are and this could lead to bigger problems than the ones we hope to resolve via this path.
评论 #10094430 未加载
AnonNo15将近 10 年前
I feel enraged that option NOT to enhance humanity is even in the picture.<p>I guess that&#x27;s the inevitable part of any new medical advance, be it vaccines, anaesthesia or even washing hands when dealing the pregnant women after working with corpses.
评论 #10093820 未加载
评论 #10094532 未加载
cryoshon将近 10 年前
I&#x27;m a molecular biologist and know a couple of things about CRISPR. I&#x27;m also a philosopher, and know a couple of things about ethics. In college, I minored in bioethics.<p>&quot;Germ line&quot; editing and production of designer babies as well as genetic re-tooling of already living people is going to happen with 100% probability. Right now there&#x27;s already embryonic screening for certain (mostly pathogenic) traits, but this will be supplanted by writing and editing of desired traits.<p>There are not going to be any long term barriers whatsoever; the future of mankind is one of directed synthetic genetics. There will be roadblocks from the regressive factions, of course, but they&#x27;ll ultimately fail. The millenials will be the ones to start to integrate this technology from the laboratory into normal human existence. Many members of generations that come after millenials will likely be heavily genetically modified, which brings us to an interesting place: the people who are currently being born right now are some of the last humans with fully &quot;organic&quot; genomes. This also means that our future as a species is radically more uncharted at this juncture than it has been since start of the industrial revolution.<p>Opening the door to synthetic genetics is going to also create new gulfs between the peoples of the world, as the norms that different societies have regarding genome editing will be different. Think Indians behave weird relative to Westerners? Well, you haven&#x27;t even met the Indian whose parents decided that his genome would be engineered to be the most effective medical doctor. Not only is this guy foreign, he&#x27;s literally made for a different purpose than you or I. It&#x27;s extremely likely that his biological intelligence and focus will surpass unaugmented people, and that will breed jealousy and hatred. Among certain populations of people, genetic augmentation will be taboo, so there will be a new undercurrent of &quot;maybe he&#x27;s augmented&quot; when a newcomer seems to perform strongly. Weird to think about these small details, but they&#x27;re coming. As I briefly mentioned before, it&#x27;ll be possible to engineer people for a certain purpose. Even right now, the knowledge of the genetics of intelligence is advanced enough to give this a very good shot. There&#x27;s always room for unintended consequuences, but we&#x27;ll wait and see.<p>As usual, the technology itself is neither good nor evil, but the usages of it will serve both ends and likely remake future human generations moving forward. The next thing that comes to mind is price: affording gene screening and editing is out of bounds for most people right now, so it&#x27;ll only be the rich, for a time. Eventually the technology will be cheap and ubiquitous, with most middle class people deciding whether or not to genetically modify themselves and their prospective children broken mostly along ethnic religious&#x2F;political lines. My immediate expectation is that the major powers (US, Russia, China, and EU) will allow for wild &quot;abuses&quot; such as allowing or subsidizing the intentional genetic extinction of certain undesirable traits or malignancies. Some of the worst abuses will probably occur when a government edits the genomes of certain minorities to prevent them from reproducing. It&#x27;s extremely unlikely that any race of people or any negative trait will go completely extinct, though.<p>Exciting time ahead, to be sure. I really hope that there are people working on viral vectors to use with this technology so that currently living people can have their genomes edited too.
评论 #10093815 未加载
评论 #10093695 未加载
评论 #10093774 未加载
评论 #10094783 未加载
hyperion2010将近 10 年前
I was talking about this with a friend a few weeks ago, and my conclusion is that this is going to be like giving a bunch of 12 year olds shotguns: beautiful and messy.<p>We can talk about &#x27;rules&#x27; all we want here in the west but there is no way you are going to be able to regulate this stuff and trying to ban the ingredients is just going to lead to people buying it from less reputable sources that have impurities so you will end up with spliced up babies that have a bunch of additional defects instead of just spliced up babies.<p>We can try to explain to our fellow citizens that there is in fact no such thing as an intelligence gene, but that won&#x27;t stop them from wanting it and certainly won&#x27;t stop the snake oil salesmen from selling it. We&#x27;ve never been here before and we learn by trial and error, just like evolution.
评论 #10093503 未加载
annoyingdisb将近 10 年前
Yes, it&#x27;s Gattaca.
评论 #10093097 未加载
评论 #10093439 未加载
grdeken将近 10 年前
This seems like a rip of this month&#x27;s Wired cover piece (which was fantastic).
djscram将近 10 年前
One issue is gene diversity. Even if most parents are making ethical decisions, at some point there will be standard, best choices. But a species with a gene pool that is not diverse is more vulnerable.