Obama Administration Supports Privacy-Invasive “Cybersecurity” Bill

I suppose when they talked about Transparency what they really meant was they'd be able to see everything you do.

For those also getting 503&#x27;d<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20150821123901&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2015&#x2F;08&#x2F;obama-administration-supports-privacy-invasive-cybersecurity-bills" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20150821123901&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.o...</a>

Its pretty clear at this point that every Western government wants to be able to spy on its own citizens as thoroughly as possible while dressing it up as &#x27;security&#x27;.<p>It is really quite sad how obviously transparent it is yet most people are indifferent. :&#x2F;

I think the Windows 10 privacy issues are going to become common in modern operating systems if they haven&#x27;t already.<p>It is going to give governments back door access into what we do online and what things we look at on the Internet and how we communicate with others.<p>All it takes are some operating system updates to install the NSA backdoor if there isn&#x27;t already one there anyway.<p>In order to secure the Internet, this bill has to have the government spy on its citizens to make sure they aren&#x27;t doing anything wrong.

Many people who use the internet see themselves as global citizens.<p>The idea of a modern nation state exists due to the weakening of religion and tribalism and creation of nationalism.<p>The internet is very threatening to nationalistic values - just like scientific thinking was to religion - and a weakening of nationalism is the ultimate threat to all world government.

Where is the outrage? All I see is passive acceptance or indifference.

Transparency for thee but not for me...