TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Beat the Fed

30 点作者 Kopion超过 9 年前

6 条评论

srmann超过 9 年前
This &quot;game&quot; seems to allow me to modify the outcome of the Fed&#x27;s policies, and not the inputs. Unless it&#x27;s advocating price controls as a means to economic prosperity, I don&#x27;t see the relevance.<p>Am I missing something here?
akuma73超过 9 年前
Perhaps I am economically naive, but why does there need to be any inflation? Why isn&#x27;t 0 a target?
评论 #10195133 未加载
评论 #10194650 未加载
评论 #10194537 未加载
评论 #10195414 未加载
评论 #10196200 未加载
评论 #10194705 未加载
评论 #10194528 未加载
评论 #10195065 未加载
评论 #10194461 未加载
评论 #10194735 未加载
nicolasehrhardt超过 9 年前
&quot;Fed’s goal: get the U.S. inflation rate to 2%&quot;: This is partially true, since the Fed&#x27;s goal is also to maximize employment[1]. So really, they should add employment rates in these different categories as well. Which makes the job even harder.<p>In fact, balancing the two was thought to be a very hard job in theory, almost impossible. And that&#x27;s why the EU central bank mission _is_ to only stabilize inflation and let each country focus on employment. (it&#x27;s less and less true because of pressure from EU countries such as France and Italy).<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.federalreserve.gov&#x2F;aboutthefed&#x2F;mission.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.federalreserve.gov&#x2F;aboutthefed&#x2F;mission.htm</a>
评论 #10194225 未加载
评论 #10194341 未加载
hammock超过 9 年前
At first glance, had no idea what I was supposed to do or how it worked. At second glance, it seems like you&#x27;re just setting price inflation on a number of components, trying to get the weighted average to be 2%. Wildly overhyped &quot;game&quot;?
评论 #10194545 未加载
nl超过 9 年前
This &quot;game&quot; is stupid because it doesn&#x27;t do anything at all to show the trade offs.<p>As a gross generalization:<p>Higher Growth -&gt; Higher Employment -&gt; Higher Inflation<p>High Inflation -&gt; Negative Income Growth (for those on low wages and fixed incomes) -&gt; Risk of Recession and&#x2F;or Social Disruption<p>Lower Growth -&gt; High Unemployment -&gt; Risk of Recession and&#x2F;or Social Disruption<p>Put those parameters in and the &quot;game&quot; gets interesting. At the moment it&#x27;s just pointless.
jessaustin超过 9 年前
It&#x27;s about time somebody did...