The Lost Decade:What the World Can Learn from 10 Years of Excesses

I only skimmed after this paragraph.<p><i>The internationally most successful film of the decade was "Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King." Harry Potter was the most successful literary character. Both are children's stories that are also enjoyed by adults. We are withdrawing into an infantile world, in which attractive heroes conquer evil. The modern fairy tale is our response to a harsh world.</i><p>Harry Potter, yes. But he thinks that The Lord of the Rings is a children's tale?? Sorry, but no. Fairy tales started as stories for grownups, and were made into children's stories when grownups stopped believing in them. However Tolkien was aware that the structure of the fairy tale lends itself to darker themes that aren't for children, and the LotR is a deliberate exploration of that dynamic.<p>Judging by my quick skim of the rest, he recited a lot of things I already knew without any real attempt at analysis, then called it perspective.

&#62;In a few days, the first decade of the 21st century and of the third millennium will come to an end.<p>Sigh. Given that our calendar started with year <i>one</i> and not year <i>zero</i>, the first decade of the 21st century started in 2001 and will end at the close of 2010.<p>/datenerd

Economic misery and turmoil through war are not new to the 21st century, and the fact that we did not achieve unending prosperity through an Internet-based economy or eternal peace through the end of the cold war should come as a surprise to none but the most naive of observers of human nature.<p>This decade was no more "lost" than was the generation that followed the "war to end all wars." Both labels arise from those who placed unbounded hopes in human potential only to discover that the drivers in this world can often be as malevolent as they can be good.<p>Will the information age change any of this, as the authors imply? There is much good that indeed comes from having the interconnectedness of instant worldwide communication and of social networks and the like. But, if someone is going to argue that this will alter centuries of human experience that has been bedeviled by the bad as well as the good, he will have to come up with something far more convincing than the headline-level analysis and naive hope in new political structures that the authors seem to espouse as the basis for our future hope.

I found the article interesting if only for the comparison of information connectivity to electrical connectivity. Just as some people feel that electricity is a basic necessity, people also feel the same about communication. A mere 30 years ago, people could not have imagined such a statement.

This made me extremely sad:<p><i>Over the last decade, the Western political system has lost its claim to global preeminence; it is no longer certain whether democracy will eventually prevail everywhere. In fact, it is not even certain that it will last forever in Western countries.</i>

Whether the 2000s feel like a lost decade depends a lot on where you lived. I don't think they were particularly bad for Canada - we had a strong economy and currency, decent government, and Quebec separatism is almost a non-issue now. We shared in the US recessions, but neither has been anywhere near as severe in Canada. We enjoyed the commodities bubble without suffering from a housing bust. All told, I don't have many complaints.<p>Similarly, I doubt it would be easy to find many eastern Europeans, Indians, or Asians that felt the 2000s were worse than the 1990s.

One page: <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,druck-668729,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,druck-6...</a>

"Climate change" isn't putting any pressure on civilization, at least not yet. Only the politicians and bureaucrats who want to use it to increase their power are putting pressure on civilization. (And researchers, sucking up to the gov't teat, who want to increase their grants).