TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Bitcoin Is Officially a Commodity, According to U.S. Regulator

296 点作者 shill超过 9 年前

19 条评论

superuser2超过 9 年前
Set aside what Bitcoin enthusiasts <i>want</i> it to be for a moment, and think about the transactions that are actually happening.<p>Is the majority of the usage pattern currency-like, where people are getting paid in BTC and buying things with BTC?<p>Or is the majority of the usage pattern that of a commodity, where people are mostly buying and selling it for fiat currency, and trying to do so at a profit?<p>I would strongly suspect the latter: the <i>vast</i> majority of BTC transactions (other than transfers between personal wallets) are the buying and selling of BTC for fiat currency.<p>Even most &quot;Pay with Bitcoin&quot; businesses are this way: in reality, all you&#x27;re doing is selling your Bitcoin to an exchange who will convert it to USD and pay the USD-denominated price of the item you&#x27;re buying. Gold certainly can&#x27;t do this so conveniently, but the principle is the same: I want to buy something, so I sell some gold and use the USD to buy things.
评论 #10237020 未加载
评论 #10236984 未加载
评论 #10237882 未加载
评论 #10236879 未加载
评论 #10237079 未加载
评论 #10237622 未加载
评论 #10237881 未加载
评论 #10236883 未加载
评论 #10236928 未加载
评论 #10237426 未加载
评论 #10237534 未加载
评论 #10239188 未加载
评论 #10237453 未加载
评论 #10237297 未加载
chrisduesing超过 9 年前
This is an interesting development. Typically commodities futures and options contracts can only be traded on a DCM (designated contract market) like ICE or CME. After leaving once DCM, the Chicago Climate Exchange, I started an exchange as a service startup, Exchangery, and sought DCM status. It requires a 12-18 month approval process, typically &gt; 500k in legal fees, and a guarantee fund that is based on the amount of money moved across the platform. The last requirement could easily be 10s of millions for something like Bitcoin. It used to only be imposed on clearing firms, but post Dodd-Frank it is applied to the exchange as well.<p>This is drastically going to thin the players in the space, and probably force most bitcoin exchanges to stay strictly in the non-derivative trading world. It might also tempt players like CME and ICE in to trading futures on Bitcoin if they think the volumes are potentially large enough.<p>As far as SEFs go, they are limited to swap trading, which can be dressed up to act like an option but isn&#x27;t really the same thing.<p>Fun times ahead.
评论 #10236858 未加载
brayton超过 9 年前
So far we have gotten Bitcoin classified:<p>* CFTC: Commodity * IRS: Property * Judge: Currency * SEC: Security * TSA: Cash<p>One step closer to world domination.
评论 #10236830 未加载
评论 #10236944 未加载
评论 #10240192 未加载
ciscoriordan超过 9 年前
Coinflip founder here. I&#x27;m not sure what this means for Bitcoin, but the CFTC taking a clear stance is a plus for Bitcoin derivatives. The chance of a serious player like CME listing Bitcoin derivatives just went from zero to non-zero.
Animats超过 9 年前
This makes sense. The CFTC regulates futures and derivatives in things other than stocks. Futures and derivatives imply that at a future time, someone will have to pay up. Without regulation, that tends to turn into a &quot;take the money and run&quot; business. If there&#x27;s some intermediary who holds customer deposits, there&#x27;s a huge temptation to speculate with customer funds. It takes regulation, audits, and guarantees of financial strength to back up such an intermediary.<p>This isn&#x27;t unique to Bitcoin. It&#x27;s a general property of futures markets. Bitcoin, though, has had far too many intermediaries go under for the short length of time it&#x27;s been in business.
bmmayer1超过 9 年前
Anyone else think it&#x27;s weird that regulators of X can decide what is defined as X?
评论 #10237811 未加载
评论 #10237279 未加载
评论 #10239114 未加载
cturner超过 9 年前
Hmm. When I think of commodity, I think of something that can be traded or consumed. Wheat? You can trade it or consume it. Metals, water rights, carbon credits? You can trade or consume them. Bitcoin doesn&#x27;t have a consumption model. It&#x27;s purely an exchange mechanism.
评论 #10239041 未加载
nickff超过 9 年前
Governments appear to be classifying bitcoin as a commodity so that they can tax and regulate it more heavily. I say this because I cannot find any definition of &#x27;money&#x27; which would not include bitcoin, and these are the effects of the classification. If I am wrong, could someone please explain how and why?<p>P.S. I have never mined, bought, sold, or possessed bitcoin.
评论 #10236782 未加载
评论 #10236769 未加载
评论 #10236773 未加载
评论 #10236768 未加载
评论 #10236804 未加载
评论 #10236754 未加载
stygiansonic超过 9 年前
Aside: I&#x27;ve always found it peculiar that there are separate agencies in the US to regular commodities and derivatives markets (CFTS) vs. the SEC, which seems to regulate only equity&#x2F;stock markets and options on stock. (But not options on futures or options on stock market indexes?)<p>Of course, it&#x27;s nothing compared to Canada - which lacks a federal securities regulator and had separate agencies for each province. (Though they are associated with one another, it seems they still have significant independence)
shmerl超过 9 年前
So, should cash also be declared commodity now?
评论 #10239002 未加载
PretzelPirate超过 9 年前
The real issue with the video in the article is that the main two guys answering questions don&#x27;t seem to really understand Bitcoin. Making the statement that as the number of transactions grow, that the price of bitcoin will drop is just completely wrong. The number of transactions will only grow if adoption grows and that will change the supply&#x2F;demand curve in a way that increases the value. And what&#x27;s with the first guy being so obsessed with PhDs and saying XT hasn&#x27;t been peer-reviewed. The review process for Bitcoin is seeing adoption by those running full nodes, if people approve of XT, they will adopt it, if not, the fork will fail.
Kinnard超过 9 年前
Any lawyers able to comment on what happens when untested federal government agency policies conflict with each other? How can you blame any company operating in this space? The agencies haven&#x27;t figured their shit how. How could a company?
评论 #10236950 未加载
tgflynn超过 9 年前
I know very little about regulations on commodities trading.<p>Is there a chance that the CFTC will decide to regulate not only trading in bitcoin derivatives but also trading in bitcoin itself ?
andy_ppp超过 9 年前
Is Bitcoin used for money laundering? It seems simpler than London property for disappearing large chunks of cash
评论 #10240039 未加载
评论 #10239053 未加载
joslin01超过 9 年前
Is this a good thing? Or bad?<p>Sure, we want it to replace money but that doesn&#x27;t seem feasible when all debts in your given country must be paid with your given country&#x27;s currency. This now puts it in the running with things like silver and gold -- perhaps it will spur more trading?
评论 #10237303 未加载
评论 #10237286 未加载
评论 #10238258 未加载
rockshassa超过 9 年前
Isn&#x27;t bitcoin explicitly a currency? I don&#x27;t see any ambiguity around that. Or do you only get to be a currency if you&#x27;re backed by a government entity that can be manipulated?
评论 #10237220 未加载
评论 #10237289 未加载
listic超过 9 年前
What is a <i>commodity</i>? Dictionary says it&#x27;s similar to <i>goods</i> or <i>merchandise</i>.
oncebitten超过 9 年前
Prediction: BitCoin will be the cause of the great world depression, watch the news.
xacaxulu超过 9 年前
Good thing mine are in a non-US based wallet :-)
评论 #10237181 未加载