TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mozilla fixed a 14-year-old bug in Firefox, Adblock Plus uses less memory

249 点作者 devNoise超过 9 年前

15 条评论

AdmiralAsshat超过 9 年前
Great for everyone still using Adblock Plus. The rest of us switched to uBlock Origin and never looked back.
评论 #10275190 未加载
评论 #10275658 未加载
评论 #10274924 未加载
评论 #10275598 未加载
评论 #10275882 未加载
评论 #10275369 未加载
9fb29947超过 9 年前
I like how 10 years passes between comment 4 and 6 in Bugzilla: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=77999#c4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugzilla.mozilla.org&#x2F;show_bug.cgi?id=77999#c4</a>
评论 #10276457 未加载
评论 #10276502 未加载
disillusioned超过 9 年前
ABP memory usage in Chrome made me switch to router-level ad blocking. Added bonus: it works on mobile too. I have weird page renderings sometimes, and whitelisting a legit site is a pain, but it&#x27;s overall a huge value to off-load the blocking to the router.
评论 #10274871 未加载
评论 #10275119 未加载
r721超过 9 年前
July discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9809384" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=9809384</a>
eponeponepon超过 9 年前
This amused me - about twenty minutes ago I&#x27;d noticed Firefox using <i>way</i> less memory that it usually does, but thought nothing more of it.<p>Jung would have something to say about synchronicity, I&#x27;m sure.
bitwarrior超过 9 年前
Not really a bug, more of an enhancement.
评论 #10275367 未加载
评论 #10274787 未加载
kzrdude超过 9 年前
Does it have a benefit on something else than ABP?
评论 #10275857 未加载
dragon88超过 9 年前
I honestly use use Ghostery which blocks all trackers. It prevents a lot of ads from loading&#x2F;working because they often have to redirect to serve me the right one (which Ghostry prevents). Waaay less of a resource suck.
ljk超过 9 年前
Does anyone know if it&#x27;s worth switching back from uBlock for?
评论 #10275701 未加载
zurn超过 9 年前
I don&#x27;t see any percentage-wise memory savings in the article or here in comments. How big a difference does a couple of MB per document make?
评论 #10279181 未加载
评论 #10276971 未加载
addicted超过 9 年前
I really prefer Ghostery. Gives a much better analysis of what&#x27;s being blocked, with fine grain controls, and much nicer UI.<p>I haven&#x27;t measured the memory consumption, but I havent had any noticeable issues so far.
评论 #10275661 未加载
评论 #10275193 未加载
cheezburgler超过 9 年前
yup, it&#x27;s totally fixed now <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;tnys5oB.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;tnys5oB.png</a>
评论 #10277032 未加载
frandroid超过 9 年前
Someone needs to get in there and do better bug prioritization...
评论 #10274838 未加载
评论 #10275729 未加载
reitanqild超过 9 年前
Hopefully they could also get around to fix the usability bug where the back button on the right click menu disappear if anything is selected...
评论 #10275232 未加载
评论 #10275913 未加载
reitanqild超过 9 年前
Hopefully they could also het arpund to fix the usability bug where the back button on the right click menu disappear if anything is selected...