Gitcolony – The next generation of pull requests

Uh, "request a demo"? I was expecting a little bit more of juicy info in those pages after reading some bold statements. I can't sign up either (even if you tell me in green letters no credit card is required), sorry. You should have just provided maybe a better overview of the service in the landing page. Dunno, maybe a full-featured video of the revolutionary features described there. I really think a nice detailed video of the unique features of the service would be great to have. It's hard to visualize what you mean with those static screenshots and text.

It looks great! One minor problem though. Once I&#x27;m signed on, I can&#x27;t seem to access the Gitcolony home page again (to see pricing etc.) -- I always get redirected to the dashboard.<p>P.S. I totally agree with this quote:<p><pre><code> Ask a programmer to review 10 lines of code, he&#x27;ll find 10 issues. Ask him to do 500 lines and he&#x27;ll say it looks good.</code></pre>

We hit the edges of GitHub pull request productivity a while back. It&#x27;s really painful for large complicated code reviews that raise issues. Was impossible to quickly review code and have confidence all raised issues were addressed.<p>Been using Reviewable for the last few weeks and it&#x27;s been really great at addressing these issues. Worth checking out, and I will check this one out too.

Looks like a hosting-agnostic solution somewhere between the opinionation of GitHub and the flexibility of Gerrit? I could see this taking off. GitHub is too opinionated and over-simplified for the tastes of some, while Gerrit is much more powerful but also showing its age.

When I first saw the name, I mistakenly read it as &quot;Gitcolonoscopy&quot;.<p>For those who don&#x27;t know, a colonoscopy is a medical procedure wherein a tube-like camera is inserted into a patient&#x27;s anus, rectum and bowels, in order for a doctor to view areas that are otherwise difficult to view.<p>It isn&#x27;t the best imagery to accidentally associate with a software product, I&#x27;m afraid!

copy suggestion:<p>&quot;Ask a programmer to review 10 lines of code, they&#x27;ll find 10 issues. Ask them to review 500 lines and they&#x27;ll say it looks good&quot;.

What does &quot;live branches&quot; mean? It isn&#x27;t clear from the descripton on the site, and there&#x27;s no further information...

&quot;Code as its written&quot; fine for collaborators, bad for over zealous managers.

&gt; next generation of pull requests<p>Would that be send-email?