Dyson Ball Vacuum Teardown

I think many people don&#x27;t realise the high level of innovation that happens over at Dyson. Before Dyson debuted his cyclonic vacuum cleaners, there was nothing else like them on the market whatsoever. Competitors brought out their own cyclonic vacuum cleaners, but the cyclonic action is only one factor, the other is the high efficiency rates they&#x27;re able to achieve in their cleaners which separates them from the rest.<p>Really nice teardown, I would love to see teardowns of other Dyson products. These guys are the Apple of the home appliance world and not many people realise it. To most, a Dyson vacuum cleaner is just an expensive cleaner and to others, they&#x27;re modern industrial design marvels.

Well-engineered hardware is definitely interesting, but unfortunately this article is rather lackluster. I&#x27;m not even talking about the many typos, but absurd claims like the suggestion that the use of Torx screws &quot;Protects Dyson from counterfeit&quot; really should not make it into an article by somebody who claims that they are &quot;engineers, like you&quot;.<p>Their try at explaining the physics involved also does not quite convey they feeling that they understood what is happening and how.

It&#x27;s interesting to have someone comment on the history of Dyson a little. For me, when shopping for a vacuum, Dyson looks like the Bose of the vacuum world: it works pretty well but is way over-hyped and certainly over-priced. But, I forget&#x2F;am too young to appreciate that before Bose&#x2F;Dyson got their bad rap today they were market leaders. Gotta keep that perspective sometimes.

Pretty interesting why they use the 6 point Torx screws: -They won’t strip during assembly -Protects Dyson from counterfeit -Makes it difficult for customers to disassemble their products<p>Never thought about using them to distinguish counterfeit products.

If this really was reviewed by Dyson, I&#x27;m surprised no one picked up on this mistake: &quot;Due to good ol’ conversion of energy&quot;. Conversion should be &quot;conservation&quot;.

Impressive to see the complex engineering and manufacturing that goes into something we see so &quot;simply&quot; as a vacuum.