TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How I Teach Gerrymandering

146 点作者 jakob223超过 9 年前

7 条评论

emehrkay超过 9 年前
I haven&#x27;t read the article yet, but I was halfway expecting to see this picture:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;thumb&#x2F;5&#x2F;55&#x2F;How_to_Steal_an_Election_-_Gerrymandering.svg&#x2F;2000px-How_to_Steal_an_Election_-_Gerrymandering.svg.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;upload.wikimedia.org&#x2F;wikipedia&#x2F;commons&#x2F;thumb&#x2F;5&#x2F;55&#x2F;Ho...</a>
评论 #10374963 未加载
gortok超过 9 年前
This is a great way to teach gerrymandering. It also illustrates the problem with &#x27;Party X is evil, Party Y is not.&#x27;<p>Political parties (stripping away all else) are groups of people who identify with one another. Take that one step further, and they&#x27;re groups of people that identify with one another <i>and believe their group is the best one to represent the whole</i>.<p>Or, if you are less idealistic, they want to win (I subscribe to the idea that they want to win because they think their way is the best way and they like the power).<p>Once you believe those few things, it&#x27;s easy to understand why politicians aren&#x27;t evil, they&#x27;re just vested in their group; in the same way you&#x27;d be vested in your group of friends vs. some random sampling of people you met on the street.<p>Does this make our current set of political problems insurmountable? No; we just have to mold the system so that no one party can have absolute control even if they control the central government. Maybe by delegating a small set of powers to the central government and keeping most governing done at the local level. Maybe we could call it a constitutional republic?
评论 #10375671 未加载
评论 #10374478 未加载
评论 #10375142 未加载
aidos超过 9 年前
I&#x27;d heard the term before but never looked into it – it was useful to have something to prompt me (partially because this article doesn&#x27;t even mention what it is). It&#x27;s when the government manipulates electorates to increase their chances of being re-elected. As someone in the UK this is something I&#x27;ve wondered about a lot over the last year.<p>If you don&#x27;t follow UK politics, we have a government that was elected with 51% of the seats on 36.9% of the votes.<p>I found this article which explains some of the mechanisms used to manipulate the outcome of these elections.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@georgetaitedwards&#x2F;is-britain-now-too-gerrymandered-to-be-a-genuine-democracy-fe2fcbd95d14" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;@georgetaitedwards&#x2F;is-britain-now-too-ger...</a>
评论 #10374071 未加载
评论 #10374061 未加载
评论 #10374096 未加载
评论 #10374367 未加载
kgreene2超过 9 年前
To anyone interested in the subject, I&#x27;d strongly recommend playing the Redistricting Game [0] which takes you through many of the processes outlined in the article<p>[0] - <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.redistrictinggame.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.redistrictinggame.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #10376959 未加载
Robadob超过 9 年前
In the UK under FPTP atleast, I can imagine there is also an effect or reverse gerrymandering or similar.<p>When it comes round to elections, generally the result of the majority of seats is already known, so they&#x27;re classified by parties into stronghold (ours), stronghold (theirs), marginal.<p>When your located within a Labour stronghold, your unlikely to see as much pro-Conservative media, as they are better off spending their time campaigning in marginals and defending their reputations in existing strongholds.<p>Surely, this effect simply compounds strongholds, making them even harder to change hands overtime, without a significant event to cause the public opinion to shift significantly (e.g. the Scottish independence referendum).<p>The only way to fix such a problem, would be to randomise the boundaries each election, but this would cause various extra complexities.
评论 #10375363 未加载
评论 #10375516 未加载
dheera超过 9 年前
Alternatively, by switching to popular vote, this problem, and many other problems could be avoided entirely. Above all things, is it fair that a voter in Massachusetts has exactly zero (and I mean exactly zero, not their fair 1&#x2F;3.2e8 share) say over the election, while a voter in Ohio carries a lot of weight?
评论 #10374899 未加载
评论 #10374717 未加载
评论 #10374780 未加载
评论 #10376686 未加载
civilian超过 9 年前
The best solution to Gerrymandering is the Alternate Vote. CGP Grey has a great video explaining it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE</a><p>He also has a great &quot;what is gerrymandering&quot; video that illustrated this same idea, but with fun animals. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Mky11UJb9AY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Mky11UJb9AY</a>
评论 #10376352 未加载