TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Axel Springer bans adblock users from Bild online

39 点作者 jhonovich超过 9 年前

18 条评论

JacobJans超过 9 年前
The response to this by the members of this community is very interesting. On the one hand, there have been many calls and support for micropayments for content. Here is a publisher offering access to their articles for a low cost. The response? People want to "fix" the issue, instead of respecting the publisher. They are offering low cost way to view the content mostly ad-free. Isn't this what we should, as readers, hope for? An alternative to ads that is low cost, and still supports the publication? What am I missing here?
评论 #10410357 未加载
评论 #10409422 未加载
评论 #10409752 未加载
danso超过 9 年前
FWIW, the Washington Post started doing this last month...and at some point they&#x27;ve apparently decided to stop doing it:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buzzfeed.com&#x2F;matthewzeitlin&#x2F;the-washington-post-begins-blocking-ad-blockers#.kwY6X76g0" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buzzfeed.com&#x2F;matthewzeitlin&#x2F;the-washington-post-b...</a><p>&gt; <i>In one case, using Chrome with AdBlock on, the Post had a dialog box redirecting users to enter their email for a free six week subscription. The anti-AdBlock measures don’t seem comprehensive just yet — we were able to view articles after clicking through from a search results link in Firefox with the ad blocking software turned on. But when we clicked through to another article on the site, the redirect screen popped up.</i>
Geekette超过 9 年前
War indeed. Well, since AdBlock introduced me to that addictive clean-browsing crack, I can&#x27;t go back.<p>I don&#x27;t read Bild but as I&#x27;ve said before, most content I view online falls under entertainment anyway. So, being blocked on sites as an AdBlock user (like Forbes now does) can only cut my procrastination time short, which isn&#x27;t a bad thing.<p>Plus, ads are not the only way to make money online. So, if it isn&#x27;t working for a company, then it&#x27;s time to pursue another business model.
评论 #10409446 未加载
评论 #10409526 未加载
equil超过 9 年前
I&#x27;d like to see a comprehensive history of adblocking. from webfree to adblock [0] to wherever we are today, because it seems like we&#x27;re stuck in a cycle. Time and time again i see the web and it&#x27;s users going through the same motions [1] [2]. It&#x27;s the same arguments and the same experiments being tried, whose success and failure are as predictable as ever [3]. Today is just another day under the falling sky.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblock.mozdev.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblock.mozdev.org&#x2F;</a><p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zdnet.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;browser-makers-warned-against-ad-blocking&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zdnet.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;browser-makers-warned-against-a...</a><p>[2] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20071011004456&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;whyfirefoxisblocked.com&#x2F;index1.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20071011004456&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;whyfirefoxi...</a><p>[3] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;2010&#x2F;03&#x2F;why-ad-blocking-is-devastating-to-the-sites-you-love&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;2010&#x2F;03&#x2F;why-ad-blocking-is-d...</a>
facetube超过 9 年前
Fix already available for ABP: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;forum&#x2F;viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=41068" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adblockplus.org&#x2F;forum&#x2F;viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=41068</a>.
dingaling超过 9 年前
Fair play to them for trying, but this approach will only work for sites that host or create original content.<p>If it&#x27;s a site that just runs Reuters feeds or press releases with some &#x27;editorialisation&#x27; then they&#x27;ll likely feel the impact of the back-button.<p>Recently I tried searching for details of the new Light.co camera. The first two pages of Google results were filled with <i>exactly</i> the same release, regurgitated on dozens of websites. None of them were useful to me, but it shows how much competition there is for eyeballs.
theoh超过 9 年前
Without confronting the massively pro-adblock crowd here head on, I just want to ask what the statistics are for Adblock use Internet-wide. Is it 10% of users or a much smaller figure?
评论 #10409425 未加载
评论 #10409409 未加载
sigmar超过 9 年前
&gt;“Whoever does not switch off the adblocker or does not pay cannot see any content on Bild.de, as of now,”<p>uBlock origin with default settings seems to load their &quot;content&quot; fine and without ads. If that changes, I&#x27;m sure one of the optional filters like &quot;anti-adblock killer&quot; will be updated accordingly
评论 #10409601 未加载
skissane超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m more than happy to pay for high quality content. For example, I pay for a subscription to LWN. But there are some things for life you&#x27;ll take (in small doses) for free, but would never pay for - for me, tabloid journalism falls into that category.
Mo3超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m sorry but who gives a shit about Bild. Pretty much everyone who reads this crap wouldn&#x27;t understand what AdBlock does in the first place.
评论 #10409430 未加载
Animats超过 9 年前
They&#x27;re checking for &quot;SMART AdServer&quot; only. Fake that and it still works.
al2o3cr超过 9 年前
Should be interesting to see what Google makes of this; it seems to be flirting with crossing the line into &quot;showing different content to visitors than the crawler&quot;, if the anti-adblock script runs for a Google referer.
评论 #10409619 未加载
DanielBMarkham超过 9 年前
Never heard of &#x27;em.<p>My gut tells me that by the holiday season we&#x27;ll see more major sites blocking ad-blockers.<p>And, of course, we&#x27;ll just use different tools. Or better yet, change our browser signatures. After all, it&#x27;s a courtesy to content providers for consumers to tell them what kinds of tools they&#x27;re using. That courtesy can be rescinded.<p>This entire spy vs. spy scenario makes me sad. I&#x27;m very sorry that the internet thought that folks walking by a storefront looking at your sales copy was a monetizable event. It is not. It was simply a fluke of the way the default technology was constructed.<p>And now I fully expect to see large, well-funded players enter the fray -- on the side of content providers. That&#x27;s also a bad thing. Going to be a lot of pain before this gets sorted out.
评论 #10409308 未加载
评论 #10409658 未加载
评论 #10409333 未加载
评论 #10409313 未加载
detaro超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m happy about everything that decreases their reach even a tiny bit. Bild is the worst kind of &quot;yellow press&quot; and way to influential.
评论 #10409638 未加载
boyter超过 9 年前
I was wondering about this the other day and thought someone here might know. How does one even determine if an ad blocker is running?
评论 #10409429 未加载
rhabarba超过 9 年前
One more take for ad blockers actually improving the Web.
iolothebard超过 9 年前
Leider, kann ich nicht Deutsch lesen :-(
JoshMnem超过 9 年前
Good riddance.