TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Kits Make Tinkerers’ Home-Automation Dreams Come True

46 点作者 fawce超过 9 年前

4 条评论

eveningcoffee超过 9 年前
I am pretty sure that people actually want network connected hardware instead of Internet-connected hardware.<p>And perhaps they also want a way to access their hardware in their home network in a secure and private way.
评论 #10432173 未加载
评论 #10433066 未加载
评论 #10431785 未加载
评论 #10431954 未加载
评论 #10431781 未加载
评论 #10431790 未加载
评论 #10435365 未加载
MrQuincle超过 9 年前
That&#x27;s definitely the case. However, these things are remarkably hard to explain to journalists. Our open source power outlet, the Crownstone, has nice conversion rates when people find us on Kickstarter. It is a problem though that journalists don&#x27;t want to hear a story about all the things you can do with kits like that. They want single use cases. They want simple stories to tell. The end user does not want that! They like to get more product for their money. I think the app market concept could only be invented by business savvy tech people... It&#x27;s our task to encourage kits and kit makers to keep doing what they are doing! Back them up! :-)
irickt超过 9 年前
Companies mentioned in the article: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;littlebits.cc&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;littlebits.cc&#x2F;</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.particle.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.particle.io&#x2F;</a>
DarkTree超过 9 年前
&quot;Jeremy Blum&#x27;s home-automation system, which he calls Jarvis, can control lights, curtains and music and can answer questions about anything using a phone, voice commands or this command center.&quot;<p>Implementations like this kind of scare me. It is certainly cool to be &#x27;able&#x27; to automate these things, but should we? Are we going to use technology to make our lives lazier, or better? No, they aren&#x27;t mutually-exclusive, but I can&#x27;t help but think that making it so you don&#x27;t have to leave your couch in order to turn off the lights is a movement toward a worse lifestyle. Your health has a much larger contribution to your standard of living than convenience, and to me, this seems like trading off one for the other (in a subtle way). However, maybe I will eventually be convinced of the net benefits. Am I approaching this wrong?
评论 #10432461 未加载
评论 #10432406 未加载
评论 #10432407 未加载