TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

NASA confirms yet again that the 'impossible' EMdrive thruster works

85 点作者 jsnathan超过 9 年前

8 条评论

ChrisLomont超过 9 年前
This is Harold White&#x27;s research group, and they have claimed many times to have validated the EM drive (and other fringe items). When I saw the headline I suspected it was him again, and sure enough, it was.<p>Google around to find out all you need to about him and his work. And whenever you see such a headline, look to see if it is his group again.<p>I&#x27;ll let each of you learn about him on your own :)
评论 #10497319 未加载
AnkhMorporkian超过 9 年前
When this Emdrive stuff first hit the news, I was positive it was just another crackpot idea or scam that wasn&#x27;t being properly tested, in the vein of E-Cat or the 100s of other examples of &#x27;physics breaking&#x27; inventions you could find with a cursory Google search.<p>However, the fact that so many labs, including Eagleworks, are building these and detecting thrust from them is making it start to grab my interest. I&#x27;m still extremely skeptical, but some of that skepticism is starting to give way to genuine excitement for the &#x27;what if?&#x27; factor.
评论 #10496877 未加载
评论 #10496813 未加载
jcfrei超过 9 年前
Behold the magically shrinking measurement error. They are down to what now? 100μN of inexplicable force?
评论 #10496884 未加载
评论 #10498486 未加载
canjobear超过 9 年前
The current title is misleading. NASA did not confirm this; a NASA engineer posted it on some forum.
评论 #10497719 未加载
Geee超过 9 年前
In other words, they haven&#x27;t yet found out the mistake in their testing procedures (or the real reason for the force).
rgacote超过 9 年前
About time to settle this issue one way or another by launching one of these devices and pointing it towards the moon. Either flies or it doesn&#x27;t.
PeterWhittaker超过 9 年前
I find the coverage of this drive simply bizarre. There is nothing impossible about it, in principle.<p>We know E=mc^2 (mass and energy are equivalent).<p>We know that rockets move by ejecting mass at high speed in a direction counter to the desired direction of movement. The rocket shifts forward an equivalent amount (m1v1=m2v2).<p>We know that it is possible to focus EM radiation emissions.<p>So far so good.<p>The &quot;magic&quot; here (used in the sense of sufficiently advanced tech, of course), is that the EM emission is entirely unidirectional.<p>So instead of throwing mass out the nozzle, we&#x27;re throwing energy. And since E=mc^2, we get the same effect: RmRv=E&#x2F;c (rocket mass times rocket speed equals Energy over c (since m2v2 = (E&#x2F;c^2)c).<p>Very, very, very cool.
评论 #10497001 未加载
评论 #10497067 未加载
评论 #10497691 未加载
est超过 9 年前
meanwhile in reddit<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;EmDrive&#x2F;comments&#x2F;3r8jo0&#x2F;next_big_future_nasa_eagleworks_has_tested_an&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;EmDrive&#x2F;comments&#x2F;3r8jo0&#x2F;next_big_fu...</a>