TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Computer, Respond to This Email

562 点作者 dpf超过 9 年前

41 条评论

supersan超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m often amazed how Google still gives it staff this unique hacker-like approach to their million dollar projects.<p>For example, the stuff in Google labs (gmail) has had some silly things like don&#x27;t hit send when you&#x27;re drunk but sometimes very useful features which may be considered unorthodox like &quot;Gmail telling you when it <i>thinks</i> you wanted to attach a file but forgot&quot;.<p>It&#x27;s something I wouldn&#x27;t generally associate with a very corporate design but here they are wanting to add another silly feature and who knows how it will turn out? Maybe it will be super useful and then all the other companies will start to copy it.<p>But the thing is they&#x27;re inventing new ways that really don&#x27;t fit your product development roadmaps. I really like that about them.
评论 #10502389 未加载
评论 #10503989 未加载
评论 #10502065 未加载
评论 #10501958 未加载
评论 #10506330 未加载
评论 #10504723 未加载
评论 #10503806 未加载
imh超过 9 年前
I appreciate the privacy standards they used (no humans reading your email to develop this), but am concerned that it&#x27;s not enough. As I understand with language models, overfitting takes the form of returning a sequence of words seen in the training set. If this is overfitting in any part of the response space, this could happen. Out of a million emails, how many suggested responses are going to substantively resemble another response the original author wouldn&#x27;t want read by others?
评论 #10501841 未加载
评论 #10501700 未加载
评论 #10505145 未加载
评论 #10502228 未加载
blixt超过 9 年前
This kind of stuff is really cool. I imagine the future of Google being the same old search box, but instead of entering a search query, you engage in a conversation with Google so you can delve deeply into a narrow topic and get back tailored responses to your question (as opposed to opening 10 tabs of Stack Overflow links that are maybe related to your question).<p>I worry a bit about the long-term risks of this kind of training (query &#x2F; reply). While this is obviously very far from being &quot;high resolution&quot; enough to single out very specific information, at some point these kinds of tools (and assistant AIs that can answer questions) will out of necessity be able to converse around very domain specific topics. At this point, how do they know what data is private and what is not? It could be tempting to train these AIs on chat logs or e-mail conversations, but that&#x27;d give them knowledge of very private information which they might leak to others. Even if they&#x27;re limited to data that is accessible anonymously, they&#x27;d be extremely good at picking up information that wasn&#x27;t intended for the public. For example, if you could describe a person called &#x2F;u&#x2F;andreasblixt on reddit, and leave it up to the bot to put the pieces together that this person is also on Facebook, Twitter, etc... and that obscure forum from 10 years ago. Food for thought.<p>A final thought on this... When these assistant AIs will inevitably have to know something about you. For example, your preferred schedule, food restrictions, preferred airlines, name, family, friends, phone numbers, where you were last night, who you&#x27;ve talked to, etc. Even if we all get our own namespaced AI assistant (i.e., the trained neural network that contains private information is stored and encrypted for your access only), that assistant&#x27;s &quot;brain&quot; may very well become a prized target because if you get access to it you can interrogate it for information (you most likely can&#x27;t just access the information in any meaningful way – you&#x27;d literally have to give it queries to make it return semantic output with the information you&#x27;re trying to access).<p>Anyway, automatic e-mail responses, yay!
评论 #10505400 未加载
icey超过 9 年前
I just started reading Avogadro Corp (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Avogadro-Corp-Singularity-Closer-Appears-ebook&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B006ACIMQQ" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Avogadro-Corp-Singularity-Closer-Appea...</a>) this weekend, and this reminds me quite a lot of the emergent AI that figures heavily in the story (ELOPe). A quick synopsis: developers build a system to &quot;improve&quot; responses from emails. The system at some point is given the ability to send emails on its own, and a poorly issued directive. It&#x27;s been an engaging read so far, and fairly hilarious since the corporation in the book is very obviously based on Google.
评论 #10501260 未加载
评论 #10502327 未加载
评论 #10503182 未加载
评论 #10501417 未加载
rcthompson超过 9 年前
Hey, remember that one time when this feature was Gmail&#x27;s April Fools Day joke[1]? Kind of funny how it&#x27;s now a serious and actually useful-looking product.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gmail.com&#x2F;mail&#x2F;help&#x2F;autopilot&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gmail.com&#x2F;mail&#x2F;help&#x2F;autopilot&#x2F;</a>
评论 #10502971 未加载
评论 #10502208 未加载
评论 #10502339 未加载
dikaiosune超过 9 年前
While the technology is very cool, this pushes me that much closer to a &quot;dumber&quot; email service. It&#x27;s always a conflict for me as I love shiny new things, but I&#x27;d rather we let AI loose on someone else&#x27;s email, especially when the AI&#x27;s revenue stream is advertising (a business predicated on knowing as much as possible about your audience).
评论 #10502838 未加载
评论 #10501245 未加载
评论 #10502466 未加载
评论 #10501301 未加载
评论 #10501598 未加载
评论 #10501566 未加载
评论 #10502106 未加载
davedx超过 9 年前
Meanwhile, Twitter change their favourites from stars to hearts.
deckar01超过 9 年前
I kept imagining it would generate responses based on MY past emails until the end of the article. Example &quot;When does your flight leave for Paris?&quot;, I was imagining it would pull the info from Google Now to reply &quot;Friday at 9am&quot;, but I don&#x27;t think it is built for this type of specific question.
评论 #10503856 未加载
mattgmg超过 9 年前
I love you.<p><i></i>* This is an automated response <i></i><i>
hokkos超过 9 年前
Does the responses generated from one user response leaks to another one ? Because this could be a major privacy flaw.
keshav57超过 9 年前
&gt; The solution was provided by Sujith Ravi, whose team developed a great machine learning system for mapping natural language responses to semantic intents. This was instrumental in several phases of the project, and was critical to solving the &quot;response diversity problem&quot;: by knowing how semantically similar two responses are, we can suggest responses that are different not only in wording, but in their underlying meaning.<p>Does anyone know where I can find out more about this? A paper or something maybe?
OkGoDoIt超过 9 年前
This looks more powerful than iOS&#x27;s context sensitive keyboard, but that also looked impressive when demoed. It will be interesting to try this out with real-world emails and see how well it works in practice.<p>This gets really exciting when implemented on a smartwatch. Single tap responses that are actually useful would make smartwatches significantly more powerful. Speech recognition is great but it&#x27;s not always appropriate for social environments.
alphydan超过 9 年前
&gt; Another bizarre feature of our early prototype was its propensity to respond with “I love you” to seemingly anything<p>Is it trained mostly on personal gmail accounts?
评论 #10503124 未加载
评论 #10501855 未加载
评论 #10501292 未加载
denniskane超过 9 年前
I have a concern that is somewhat related to this issue. I&#x27;ve been wanting to play around with doing NLP in the client using the SpeechRecognition API available in Chrome. It typically gives pretty good results for simple recognition purposes, but there is not yet any way to specify an arbitrary grammar for the backend service to use. This is a big deal when someone wants to be able to recognize a name spelled like &quot;Bobbie&quot; rather than &quot;Bobby&quot;. The W3C Web Speech spec currently allows for setting arbitrary grammars, but it isn&#x27;t implemented. I&#x27;m just saying it would be cool if some of you AI geniuses at Google could help me out on that front.<p>You can play around with the dumb little AI app that I&#x27;ve been working on that does a little bit of NLP in the browser. Check out this site with Chrome: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;yc-prototype.appspot.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;yc-prototype.appspot.com</a>. His name is Bertie. You should see his face on the bottom of the page. The site works like an OS in your browser.
novalis78超过 9 年前
Interesting. I used a sequence to sequence methodology about 10 years ago in a chatbot that won in a self-learning competition ... of course never had the data available that google has.<p>A bot like that is a great tool to experiment with NLP and ML ideas. This is really an intriguing area of research.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thinkingai.wordpress.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;thinkingai.wordpress.com&#x2F;</a>
julianozen超过 9 年前
Where&#x27;s the &quot;sorry, I won&#x27;t be able to make it.&quot; in the server dropping email.
tabrischen超过 9 年前
When you receive a call today, you are already prompted with auto response messages such as &#x27;I&#x27;m busy, I&#x27;ll call you back.&#x27; This seems like the natural next step.
评论 #10504123 未加载
drzaiusapelord超过 9 年前
&gt; But replying to email on mobile is a real pain, even for short replies.<p>Imo, this has already been solved. I just whisper replies into my watch for both email and SMS. Google&#x27;s voice recognition is finally good enough for this. I can&#x27;t think of anything more convenient.<p>I&#x27;m not sure if AI-ish replies are something I&#x27;m interested in. Throwing complex fuzzy logic at what should be a hardware&#x2F;interface problem seems shortsighted. I prefer a much higher level of granular control, especially if these messages are work related.
jes5199超过 9 年前
Did they really write this whole article about machine-generated text but not actually include an example of the actual reply the system generated?
评论 #10505188 未加载
评论 #10505197 未加载
jasonmorton超过 9 年前
This is almost exactly the singularity-igniting innovation described in the sci fi book &quot;Avogadro Corp&quot; by William Hertling.
rasz_pl超过 9 年前
What could possibly go wrong?<p>dudette:are we still on for dinner with my mom?<p>dude:sure, cant wait to see mrs.Plinketon again.<p>dudette gets suggested reply message generated from one of dude&#x27;s earlier emails to his friends: &quot;mrs.Plinketon has great tits!&quot;<p>It is amazing to realize this type of technology can be bootstrapped only once (?)- as soon as you start getting automated replies in the system quality of learning on past data will drop, at some point snake will be eating his own automated reply tail.<p>I imagine this system would benefit greatly from optional additional user voice input, something as simple as 1-3 spoken words fed back into Reply network to help with the reply intent decoding. You get email, NN generates 3 replies it thinks you would like, you have different idea for a reply, click microphone icon and say &quot;no, maybe next week&quot;, Reply network rebuilds suggested answers with your input shaping reply vector.
mapleoin超过 9 年前
Finally! This will dispel all those rumours that Google reads all your email.
评论 #10501177 未加载
评论 #10501110 未加载
barnacs超过 9 年前
Privacy issues aside, please don&#x27;t. These kinds of features are outright harmful to our society.<p>Human communication and our social skills in general have already detoriated a lot by replacing face to face conversations with audio only, then text.<p>This is just further taking away the incentive to sneak in something personal, something human into our written communication every now and then.<p>IMO, the very reason someone takes the time to type out these kinds of questions as an email message is to make it more personal. Otherwise, they could just use an rsvp&#x2F;calendar system or a bug tracker for the particular queries in the article, which already enable you to send such generic replies with 1 or 2 taps at most.<p>Can we stop misusing technology to dumb down our everyday lives and stop transforming our society into a bunch of isolated individuals living on the same planet?
yeukhon超过 9 年前
Minus all other concerns, for the operation &#x2F; infrastructure &#x2F; devops, the auto-replying about server downtime or inquiry about performance, those kinds of stuff is something I am actively thinking about and starting to learn how to implement in my organization.
Animats超过 9 年前
Slowly, the personal assistants will get smarter and do more of your job. Then you get laid off.
MikeTV超过 9 年前
There&#x27;s a quip at the bottom: &quot;This blog post may or may not have actually been written by a neural network.&quot;<p>Has there been any progress in AI-driven&#x2F;assisted creative writing (other than sportscasts)?
sagarjauhari超过 9 年前
Similar to the quick text feature when not taking a phone call, this could come in handy - especially on phones.<p>But does that mean I&#x27;ll have to re-enable Inbox to try it. Duh :(
sandworm101超过 9 年前
&quot;...In developing Smart Reply we adhered to the same rigorous user privacy standards we’ve always held -- in other words, no humans reading your email.&quot;<p>That the humans at Google may read my email is the least of my privacy concerns. That the robots will pass them along to other robots at places other than google is the real worry. But as no such agency exists, why worry?
WWKong超过 9 年前
The real potential here is eliminating human interaction. On the sending end machine should auto compose, auto target a mailing list, send it out. On receiving end machine should scan incoming email, compose a response, send it out. That would cover 95% of current email traffic.
scottm30超过 9 年前
I&#x27;d love to see this extended in future to include:<p>- using mannerisms I have used with the sender in past emails<p>- scan my calendar schedule and have an idea of my availability and use that in the response<p>The product in its current form sounds great and I&#x27;m keen to give it a try.
killion超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m not sure I trust that this will work that well. Because I still get other peoples flights added to my calendar automatically if they forward their itinerary to me.
JabavuAdams超过 9 年前
Are these kinds of projects only available in Mountain View?
rdl超过 9 年前
This would seem to be an area where senders could alter behavior to make things work better with this...maybe being explicit about the question and options.
msoad超过 9 年前
It&#x27;s not available for Google Apps users or am I missing something? It doesn&#x27;t show any replies to me...
评论 #10501294 未加载
zhanwei超过 9 年前
next step, check your calendar for scheduling conflict and suggest the right response, i.e., &quot;i&#x27;ll be there&quot;&#x2F;&quot;i can&#x27;t make it&quot;.<p>further extension, pull out quick answers from other emails, i.e., &quot;what&#x27;s the sales number this month?&quot; &quot;100M&quot; from another email
ambicapter超过 9 年前
Sounds like the system has no way to take into account context. Each message is encoded into a &#x27;thought&#x27; vector, but is it difficult to come up with a &#x27;thought&#x27; that changes meaning depending on prior messages? I imagine it is such a concern that leads one to look into Hierarchical Temporal Memory and similar techniques.
hmate9超过 9 年前
Maybe shortly we&#x27;ll just have neural networks talking to each other on behalf of us.
评论 #10504002 未加载
ksk超过 9 年前
I guess I&#x27;ve already automatically consented to Google using my emails to train their algorithms. How does filing bugs work in the scenario where the machine learning can&#x27;t figure something out? Is a copy of someones personal email attached to the bug report?
shrikrishna超过 9 年前
In a parodical reality with mistaken pressings of the &quot;two buttons to reply&quot; feature<p>&gt; Obama: Hey Hillary, what do you think, should we bomb &lt;X&gt;?<p>&gt; Hillary: Sure! Count me in!<p>&gt; Hillary: Hey! Don&#x27;t consider that last email! Damn auto reply...<p>That aside, as a fellow nerd, neural net FTW!
pjmlp超过 9 年前
Waiting for the news about social and legal problems that will happen from typing on the wrong answer.
评论 #10501467 未加载
Sevzinn超过 9 年前
Senior research scientist? So, a forgetful research scientist?