TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Uber drivers consider legal action

28 点作者 rb2e超过 9 年前

9 条评论

will_brown超过 9 年前
Always with the employee&#x2F;contractor issue...<p>It has always been my prediction that there is a legal action lurking in the shadows that will ultimately be the undoing of the ~$50B unicorn, but employee&#x2F;contractor is not it (these can be resolved moving forward with jurisdiction specific revisions to driver agreements and tweaks to the actual process to ensure compliance on a jurisdictional basis).<p>However, the legal action to ruin the company? My guess is a class action of drivers who have been arrested&#x2F;criminally charged while serving as UBER drivers. Moreover, I believe such a case would open up a can of worms including: 1. UBER recruiting&#x2F;paying bonuses to drivers to leave counties where ride sharing is legal to drive in counties where ride sharing is illegal, subsequently resulting in criminal charges; and 2. UBER&#x27;s payment of criminal defense counsel for said drivers (which on its face may not seem problematic, but I would be willing to bet not a single lawyer paid by UBER to represent the drivers ever once advised the drivers they may have civil causes of action against UBER).
VincentEvans超过 9 年前
Does anyone else consider 20% (soon 25%) cut excessive?<p>Personally i think driving for Uber is nearly pointless - the costs of operating a vehicle make this occupation very unattractive. But i think the 20% rent makes it even worse.<p>Many of legal problems Uber faces could be avoided if they simply charged drivers a fixed subscription fee to be &quot;listed&quot; with the service. 100$&#x2F;month? 10$&#x2F;day? I don&#x27;t know, but i can&#x27;t shake the feeling that this service is crap work and it has a lot to do with greed.
评论 #10520110 未加载
评论 #10520155 未加载
评论 #10520099 未加载
评论 #10520100 未加载
评论 #10520261 未加载
blisterpeanuts超过 9 年前
The drivers who would rather be employees--which Uber claims are a small minority--might be better off finding a traditional job with a livery service. The whole point of Uber and its ilk, or so I thought, was to &quot;crowd-source&quot; transportation using ride <i>sharing</i>. It&#x27;s not &quot;sharing&quot; if they&#x27;re employees.<p>Amazon Flex is going to crowd-source deliveries by engaging tens of thousands of individuals to drop off packages in their neighborhoods. Does that mean Amazon must automatically hire tens of thousands of employees, with all the paperwork and overhead, even if some of them only deliver an occasional package?<p>This whole approach probably needs to be hashed out in the courts, but my gut feeling is that some people are wanting to have their cake and eat it too--the ease and flexibility of self-employment combined with the benefits of full time employment.
评论 #10520074 未加载
评论 #10519686 未加载
评论 #10519735 未加载
评论 #10520085 未加载
zeveb超过 9 年前
They existed and fed themselves before Uber existed; they freely chose to join Uber as contractors; now they want to break the contract they have and be employees. How does this seem right?
评论 #10519990 未加载
评论 #10519988 未加载
评论 #10520044 未加载
评论 #10519997 未加载
nns超过 9 年前
For someone wanting to start an on-demand service, what would be the correct way to design their app so that you could meaningfully link requester to providers?
评论 #10519829 未加载
评论 #10519870 未加载
rm_-rf_slash超过 9 年前
We need a third class of employment, the employee-contractor. It is one thing for independent contractors to provide a service for a company without necessarily being employed by the company, like a software consultant, but when a business cannot exist without so-called independent contractors (unless they&#x27;re hired outright), then they ought to be responsible for some of the cost, such as gasoline or repairs, but at the same time, their contract can be canceled at any time by the employer. That gives the employer flexibility and the employer-contractors stability.
dheera超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m not sure about &quot;paid time off&quot;. It&#x27;s not a salaried job in the first place -- you work as little or as much as you want, and take vacation whenever and however much you want. However, give them a time&#x2F;distance-wise wage increase to get to an equilibrium point where most drivers are generally happy in life with the amount of unpaid time they can feasibly take off.
throwaway049超过 9 年前
BBC headline is a little misleading. According to the article, legal action has already been taken. Cases have been submitted to the London Central Employment Tribunal.
miguelrochefort超过 9 年前
That clearly is the future of employment.<p>Better get used to it now.
评论 #10519717 未加载
评论 #10519864 未加载