TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Visualizing Bayes’ theorem (2009)

53 点作者 SimplyUseless超过 9 年前

6 条评论

ttkeil超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m still quite fond of the Lego example:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.countbayesie.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2015&#x2F;2&#x2F;18&#x2F;bayes-theorem-with-lego" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.countbayesie.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2015&#x2F;2&#x2F;18&#x2F;bayes-theorem-wi...</a>
评论 #10666703 未加载
leonnn超过 9 年前
This seems to me to be the best way to understand Bayes&#x27; theorem, with natural frequencies being the best way to mentally compute with it. E.g. for the breast cancer example,<p>- Imagine there are 1000 women who participate in routine screening<p>- 1% → 10 of these have breast cancer<p>- 80% → 8 of these will get positive mammograms<p>- 990 don&#x27;t have breast cancer<p>- 9.6% ≅ 10% → 99 of the 990 get positive mammograms<p>So that the probability of having breast cancer, given a positive mammogram, is ≅ 8&#x2F;99 ≅ 8%.<p>There is a bunch of research on natural frequencies being generally the best way to reason about this sort of thing.
评论 #10667324 未加载
lordnacho超过 9 年前
Isn&#x27;t this the bog standard way to visualize Bayes&#x27; theorem?<p>Still appreciate it though.
1971genocide超过 9 年前
Took a entire module on Bayesian Method in University.<p>Failed it.<p>Gave the exam a second time - this time I spent the whole summer studying it - failed it again :(<p>At this point I think bayesian methods is one of those things like Monads - you either understand it or you never will.<p>Hopefully there is someone out there who finally writes a good book to explain it to the masses of simpler minds.
评论 #10667610 未加载
评论 #10666763 未加载
评论 #10667425 未加载
foobarbecue超过 9 年前
“people with cancer” (designated as A), and “people with no cancer” (or A)<p>Presumably the second &quot;A&quot; is supposed to appear as some symbol for &quot;not A&quot;? On my screen it just appears to say A.
p1esk超过 9 年前
Bayes Theorem is easy. But determining its components can get tricky.