TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mochizuki Workshop at Oxford

28 点作者 subnaught超过 9 年前

3 条评论

quanticle超过 9 年前
Also, the blog post buries the lede somewhat. I found that this was the most important bit:<p><pre><code> Update: Turns out the “unexpectedly positive” was a reaction to day 3, which covered pre-IUT material. Today, when things turned to the IUT stuff, it did not go well at all. See the link in the comments from lieven le bruyn to a report from Felipe Voloch. Unfortunately it now looks quite possible that the end result of this workshop will be a consensus that the IUT part of this story is just hopelessly impenetrable. </code></pre> So while there was an early sense of optimism that the gathered mathematicians would be able to find some way through the papers at the beginning of the week, it seems that optimism has soured as the week progressed.
mherrmann超过 9 年前
Science is about publishing results that others can reproduce and check. Failing to make a theory accessible to the world experts (!) in the field is about as useful as not having the theory at all. Despite what some introvert mathematicians may think, science necessarily involves other humans.<p>If I were one of the experts I would give it that one week and if nothing interesting comes up stop wasting my time on it.
评论 #10726096 未加载
评论 #10726661 未加载
Jerry2超过 9 年前
The link to the paper mentioned in the post is broken. Here&#x27;s the actual link: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;people.maths.ox.ac.uk&#x2F;kimm&#x2F;papers&#x2F;pre-iutt.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;people.maths.ox.ac.uk&#x2F;kimm&#x2F;papers&#x2F;pre-iutt.pdf</a>
评论 #10726054 未加载