TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Physicists believe they can create matter from colliding photons

78 点作者 stonlyb超过 9 年前

11 条评论

dspeyer超过 9 年前
The timeline:<p><pre><code> 1934: This is predicted 1997: This is done http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;1997&#x2F;09&#x2F;16&#x2F;science&#x2F;scientists-use-light-to-create-particles.html 2014: We will &quot;demonstrate the feat within the next 12 months&quot; 2015: Didn&#x27;t bother</code></pre>
评论 #10795276 未加载
eloff超过 9 年前
Has anyone ever wondered why the C^2 in E=MC^2 I&#x27;m sure it wasn&#x27;t chosen at random just because a large constant was needed, it must fall out of some other physics equations.<p>But still, what does that mean? What does the transmutation of energy into mass or visa versa have to do with the universal speed limit?<p>I am always struck by the inexplicable power of mathematics to describe the physical laws of the universe, in often simple equations like this. It doesn&#x27;t have to be that way as far as we know.
评论 #10794592 未加载
评论 #10794599 未加载
评论 #10794568 未加载
评论 #10794583 未加载
评论 #10794810 未加载
评论 #10799331 未加载
评论 #10794548 未加载
评论 #10795149 未加载
fatuna超过 9 年前
This article appears to be 1,5 years old. So at least the 1 year deadline was missed.
jp555超过 9 年前
If we could trap those positrons somehow in large numbers...<p>Antimatter production?
评论 #10796254 未加载
dosh超过 9 年前
This is exciting. Not sure how they will go from electron-positron creation to protons which needs quarks, but according to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Matter_creation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Matter_creation</a><p>Summary: Matter creation is the conversion of massless particles into one or more massive particles. Since all known massless particles are bosons and the most familiar massive particles are fermions, usually what is considered is the process which converts two bosons (e.g. photons) into two fermions (e.g., an electron–positron pair). This process is known as pair production.<p>So technically, it is a matter creation.
评论 #10794302 未加载
评论 #10794339 未加载
venomsnake超过 9 年前
Can anyone explain when and where the Higgs enters the reaction? That is the most interesting for me, since we don&#x27;t have anti Higgs.
评论 #10794214 未加载
评论 #10794099 未加载
评论 #10794315 未加载
评论 #10793008 未加载
ambrop7超过 9 年前
I imagine &quot;matter&quot; as commonly understood would contain at least electrons and protons, but they would just be making electrons and positrons. Can we make protons&#x2F;neutrons out of light too?
评论 #10794295 未加载
评论 #10794219 未加载
negamax超过 9 年前
So was light first or matter?<p>Was there early radiation (light != visible light only) which created matter. H -&gt; He -&gt; Stars. Or matter preexisted?
评论 #10797028 未加载
评论 #10796261 未加载
maplechori超过 9 年前
Are we going to be able to materialize dinner soon?
评论 #10794701 未加载
grondilu超过 9 年前
Didn&#x27;t we know that ever since E=mc² ?
评论 #10794218 未加载
mrerrormessage超过 9 年前
If this can be made practical at any scale, I think the most exciting applications will be in long-range space drives. Although it sounds as though immense amounts of energy are needed, not needing to take along matter to eject in order to move is a game changer for space exploration.
评论 #10794826 未加载
评论 #10794362 未加载