Please see The Reg's article about this (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/31/kerviel/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/31/kerviel/</a>). The WSJ's article is nothing but parroting of SG's press releases. They are hard at work trying to save their asses, and everybody in the industry agrees that JKE could not have done what he did without his managers knowing, and furthermore, that he is now made into a scapegoat. WSJ is right about one thing: they are full of hubris.