TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

British nukes were only protected by bike locks

48 点作者 petewarden超过 15 年前

7 条评论

mattmaroon超过 15 年前
It's been known widely for some time that on every British nuclear-armed sub, there's a safe, and in that safe another safe, and in that second safe a note from the Prime Minister commanding the sub on what to do in the event that the motherland should be wiped out in an attack while they were away.<p>That would mean it is impossible that they need some sort of special code, as if they did, that code would have to be accessible to them already, and then what is the point?
评论 #1087939 未加载
评论 #1087559 未加载
swixmix超过 15 年前
Summary: British submarines can launch missiles.<p>From the article: "..nuclear bombs were armed by turning a bicycle lock key. There was no other security on the bomb itself."<p>By the way, it's a freaking submarine.<p>Perspective: I lock a gun's trigger with a bike lock, and then place it in a safe. The safe is inside a bank vault.<p>If I do manage to steal the gun, then I can pick the lock and use it. If I do manage to steal the arming key, then I can convince the crew to launch the missile.<p>Would you like to play a game?<p>edit: Grammar
评论 #1088498 未加载
Eliezer超过 15 年前
&#62; However, the Royal Navy argued that its officers could be trusted and: "It would be invidious to suggest... that senior Service officers may, in difficult circumstances, act in defiance of their clear orders."<p>Even by the standards of a world gone mad, these people are #@!%ing lunatics.
bensummers超过 15 年前
Comments here <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/british_nuclear.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/british_nuclea...</a> suggest the US just used 111111 as their code. (citation needed)
评论 #1087529 未加载
评论 #1087978 未加载
评论 #1087494 未加载
arethuza超过 15 年前
For anyone interested in this kind of stuff I can recommend this book:<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-State-Whitehall-Cold-War/dp/0141008350" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-State-Whitehall-Cold-War/dp/0...</a><p>The story of how the government planned to communicate with the V bomber fleet is wonderful...
MrSartorial超过 15 年前
Wow, that's really interesting. I think that Britain is firmly in the wrong on this one. That places a lot of trust in a lot of individuals hands, which I don't necessarily have a problem with because of a number of psychological factors related to their employment in the army, but that doesn't discount someone infiltrating the systems and activating the missiles.
评论 #1088503 未加载
评论 #1087530 未加载
joubert超过 15 年前
That's nothing. In the US, we fly nuclear warheads across states. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20427730/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20427730/</a>
评论 #1087508 未加载