TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Obama’s 2011 Budget Proposal, Department by Department (Infographic)

54 点作者 bengebre超过 15 年前

13 条评论

timr超过 15 年前
One thing that should immediately pop out at even the casual observer: the traditional bugaboos of the right (social services for poor people, welfare, etc.) are a tiny, tiny minority of the budget. You can cut them down to an expenditure of 0, and you won't really change the bottom line.<p>If we're going to come to terms with the national deficit, we're going to have to accept the fact that military, social security and medicare expenditures are going to have to shrink. The problem is not poor people: it's old people and wars.
评论 #1093909 未加载
评论 #1093966 未加载
评论 #1093965 未加载
maukdaddy超过 15 年前
$251 billion (+33%) in interest. That is a staggering figure.
rms超过 15 年前
<a href="http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Politics_is_the_Mind-Killer" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Politics_is_the_Mind-Killer</a>
jasondavies超过 15 年前
Unfortunately the colour spectrum is unfriendly to those of us with red-green colour blindness: it's hard to differentiate between positive and negative percentage changes without looking at the tooltips. Aside from that, nice treemap.
dantheman超过 15 年前
Some Observations, I always find it interesting how the break it up.<p>1. Normally the FBI &#38; DOE are not considered national defense<p>2. Why is Medicare separate from health?<p>3. Why are veterans benefits &#38; Military Retirement not considered national defense<p>This diagram is very misleading as criminal investigations is squirreled away under Administration. From this breakdown you can't actually tell how much is being spent on each top level category, which defeats the purpose of this type of graph.
评论 #1093653 未加载
evanjacobs超过 15 年前
I'm going to start a business to sell services to the US government. Even if I only capture 1% of the market that's $36 billion per year!
评论 #1093960 未加载
mattwdelong超过 15 年前
Next book on my reading list is The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith, so that I can finally understand all of this Economic mess the world is in. Of course it won't give me a full understand, but I have been told it will send me in the right direction.<p>Recently, I have been trying to understand what exactly a dollar is. From what I can tell, its pretty useless.<p>I've determined that money != wealth.
评论 #1094535 未加载
评论 #1095008 未加载
matty超过 15 年前
Related: <a href="http://www.wallstats.com/deathandtaxes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wallstats.com/deathandtaxes/</a><p>I always thought this was a pretty good visual representation of budget distribution. Note this reflects the 2010 budget, not the proposed 2011 budget.
评论 #1094087 未加载
pkaler超过 15 年前
This is the expenses side. It'd be nice to see an infographic on the revenue side. (Taxes, etc.)
warfangle超过 15 年前
Mass transit is being cut, as is R&#38;D, healthcare, and so forth. Joy of joys.
评论 #1093497 未加载
olalonde超过 15 年前
If only we could change "National Defense" by "Startup Fund".
jbooth超过 15 年前
What, no giant red box marked "Socialism"? And they're underfunding the death panels!
robryan超过 15 年前
They should cut military spending and focus more on nuclear type weapons, sure they will no longer have the same power in tactical ground warfare but it would be basically saying, sure you may be able to out maneuver us now but we can defiantly blow you off the face of the earth if you try.
评论 #1094088 未加载
评论 #1094133 未加载