TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Startup idea: Amazon S3 / CloudFront cost distributor

5 点作者 jeff18超过 15 年前
This seems too simple, so I may be missing something but here goes.<p>Right now Amazon charges $0.15 / GB of Amazon CloudFront data transfer. However, if you do a higher volume, it gets progressively cheaper, until at over 1000 TB, you are only charged $0.03 / GB.<p>Someone should create a competitive CDN that sells premium bandwidth for say, $0.05 / GB, dramatically undercutting everyone in the business by a huge margin.<p>How would one or two co-founders possibly compete with Amazon CloudFront in quality and price? The backend would actually be Amazon CloudFront! Since you would rapidly exceed the 1000 TB amount, you'd be able to pass the savings onto your customers.<p>To be 100% sure that you make a profit, you could wait until you get enough people to pledge to switch to your service before launching for it to become profitable from day 1.<p>Sign me up for 10 TB of usage.

3 条评论

shedd超过 15 年前
This is essentially what EngineYard does with their Cloud offering and how they've been able to reduce prices recently:<p><i>We’re able to provide this new lower pricing because of a new capability from Amazon Web Services that allows us to group all our customer accounts into a single billing entity with Amazon. So, we’re now able to use a single virtual pool of reserved instance capacity from Amazon, and pass along these savings to customers. This means all of our customers get to reap the benefits of reserved instances without the need to pay the reserved instance costs up front. No other cloud platform provider has been as aggressive as us in slashing prices as our cost goes down.</i><p>FROM: <a href="http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/announcement-engine-yard-cloud-price-reductions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/announcement-engine-yard...</a>
wmf超过 15 年前
Ah, arbitrage. I have long wondered what Amazon's justification is for this tiered pricing; <i>their</i> cost per GB should be the same for all customers.<p>Also see previous discussion: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=960123" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=960123</a>
评论 #1102172 未加载
amock超过 15 年前
What's stopping you from doing this? If you can get enough people to sign to be profitable from the start it seems like you don't have much to lose.
评论 #1101774 未加载