TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Next Leg Of The Housing Crisis In Five Simple Charts

66 点作者 limist超过 15 年前

6 条评论

jcromartie超过 15 年前
So maybe I shouldn't buy this $200K foreclosure?<p>Some actual actionable advice from a comment there:<p>"" If you are agonizing about whether to buy real estate now or later, maybe you'd better define "real estate"<p>It's hard to see the value in buying a "suburban middle class home in CT" right now, or a year or three down the line if/when prices dive again. You may as well rent it and save a lot of money (and headaches) if all you are gonna do is park your car, watch TV and sleep there. Call that "fake estate"<p>If you want your real property to produce anything of real value, the best time to buy was yesterday, and you could already be at work building the soil, planting fruit trees and garden beds, installing some distributed energy source like solar or wind, and improving the structure. It takes a few years at least to get this sort of thing going, especially if you are doing it after work and on weekends. Invest in infrastructure during this so-called "deflationary period" and take advantage of gov't subsidies and tax breaks for energy efficient appliances, insulation, solar panels, whatever.<p>If things really are gonna be so grim, you are probably soon going to be at best "underemployed" and maybe even a little hungry...<p>Here's another idea - rent your house, and buy some cheap agricultural land within an hour's drive or less (go in with your friends and/or family maybe and it'll be even cheaper) and lease it to an organic farmer. That property may actually appreciate quite a bit in the coming years.<p>Or if you are not cut out to be a farmer, buy a multi-unit that you can fix up, live in and rent out the other units.<p>The whole point of real estate ownership used to be that it was a factor of production, not a financial abstraction that magically provides some rate of return while you rent it from the bank. If you are not going to improve the property in some way, and realize some income from it, don't bother buying it. If all you are willing to invest in life is fiat currency, you may eventually get lucky and get it back by the wheelbarrow full, with many more zeroes on it. ""
评论 #1104546 未加载
评论 #1104618 未加载
nathanwdavis超过 15 年前
The last point seems to indicate he thinks less new home sales volume leads to lower prices on houses in general.<p>This makes no sense to me. I see that as a good thing for home prices. If less new homes are sold then more existing homes will sell which means more demand and rising home prices.<p>The fact that there is less new home sales is just a result of home builders starting fewer communities out of realization that there is too much inventory already.
评论 #1104455 未加载
joelhaus超过 15 年前
No one has mentioned this, but if you buy into the argument that the housing market is in for another downturn, there is plenty of opportunity to cash in. Not sure what the CDS market is like these days, but I know that congress hasn't got around to regulating it yet and a small number of investors made out really well by taking large positions last time around.<p>Some additional data on current housing trends here: <a href="http://www.nnnrent.com/2010/02/housing-crash-profits/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nnnrent.com/2010/02/housing-crash-profits/</a> ...charts galore too.
steveplace超过 15 年前
Take zerohedge with a HUGE grain of salt.
评论 #1106119 未加载
dminor超过 15 年前
The ratio of existing to new homes makes sense since no one's been building the last couple of years, but that shadow inventory is definitely worrying.
评论 #1104315 未加载
joe_the_user超过 15 年前
<i>...the sole reason why mortgage rates have been as los as they have, has been due to the Fed's constant manpulation of the MBS market via the $1.4 trillion MBS/Agency QE purchase program. With this program set to expire in 2 months, rates are set to explode.</i><p>Uh, yes but it's old story - when the end of a program would mean the end of the economy ... the chance are they'll continue the program(duh).<p>That's not saying this crash isn't coming, it's just saying you can't be sure it will come on schedule. The US economy is becoming depend on more and more things - the state injecting money, China buying bonds. This kind of situation <i>can</i> go on, it can go on longer than you'd think. It just will eventually go under. The housing boom lasted five years. While the present ad-hoc, artificial economy seems much more fragile, we could plausibly give it a couple years to crumble. 2011, better watch out...