Code management that doesn't suck

The headline is somewhat insulting, because I don&#x27;t think my current code management system sucks.....different strokes for different folks, I guess.<p>The product being marketed is a replacement for Gerrit, though. They have found a different way to handle code reviews, merges, and also added features like issue trackers and integrations with other tools. It might be worth taking a look at, but I tend to prefer free (as in speech) tools over proprietary tools.

Some of the English is sounds a bit quirky to me ... &quot;Pull Requests like never seen before&quot;?<p>Interesting nonetheless as we&#x27;ve been looking for software similar to Gerrit.

I love the features of GitColony. At GitLab we had many similar requests. We already implemented multiple reviewers, rebasing, marking something as a work in progress. But many of their other features are also very useful. And the good news is GitLab support is coming soon.

The pricing is a little weird here. As the team size grows, it gets <i></i>more<i></i> expensive per head at every pricing level. Usually, it&#x27;s the opposite.

This looks interesting. Does it give you the ability to setup rules so, say, X amount of reviewers must approve a PR before it could get merged? Also what about protecting, say, master from direct pushes? Github seems stagnant and I know Gitlab is rapidly working on many of these types of features; it would be cool to see better support for reviews in general in any of these systems.

So how does the workflow work, if you&#x27;re already using Github and want to keep hosting your projects there? Does it simply pull and push commits via an app token?

I don&#x27;t see &quot;distributed&quot; anywhere on the product page. That makes it DOA for me, but nice effort