TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Watson for President

304 点作者 derEitel超过 9 年前

70 条评论

clort超过 9 年前
Having an AI as the president would make it clear to all that there is an invisible group of people behind the president, pushing them to act and say things that they want. I agree that even now Watson could probably make decisions better based on actual facts but if Watson says something that is unpalatable to its owners then they can reboot it with a different set of facts. IIRC they did that after they fed it the urban dictionary and it started swearing too much[1]<p>At least with a human president, there is the chance that they will grow up and shrug off the orders they are given. The power actually lies with the person that was elected, not the invisible people who paid to get them the job.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;ibms-watson-memorized-the-entire-urban-dictionary-then-his-overlords-had-to-delete-it&#x2F;267047&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;ibms-w...</a>
评论 #11048025 未加载
评论 #11047762 未加载
评论 #11047443 未加载
评论 #11048081 未加载
评论 #11048882 未加载
评论 #11048300 未加载
评论 #11047420 未加载
评论 #11047670 未加载
评论 #11048367 未加载
评论 #11047929 未加载
评论 #11050215 未加载
评论 #11047968 未加载
mudil超过 9 年前
What humanity needs is to put politics (and political science, for that matter) on scientific foundation.<p>No other area of human activity is so unscientific and so replete with falsehoods and lies as politics. We don&#x27;t tolerate physicists or doctors lying, but lying in politics is a norm. Add to this a mix of dogmas, ideologies (often based on backward religious ideas), wishful thinking, and yes, men&#x27;s testosterone power plays, and you have a recipe for non-progress, wars, subjugations, geopolitical games, etc etc etc. Even ideas that look like a noble cause often backfire and result in death and destruction.<p>Scientifically-based politics should be a norm in the 21th century.
评论 #11048751 未加载
评论 #11048704 未加载
评论 #11048869 未加载
评论 #11048629 未加载
评论 #11048894 未加载
评论 #11048753 未加载
评论 #11048905 未加载
评论 #11049066 未加载
评论 #11049097 未加载
评论 #11048895 未加载
评论 #11049663 未加载
评论 #11049134 未加载
评论 #11048682 未加载
karmacondon超过 9 年前
My favorite quote about Watson is &quot;If Watson is so smart, how come it can&#x27;t figure out how to stop three years of declining sales numbers at IBM?&quot;<p>More than anything, this ad makes me think of how long of a way we have to go before this type of AI will be useful to humans, much less able to run a country. Why doesn&#x27;t President Obama consult Watson before making decisions? Because every decision would require a massive data collection and processing project, training and tuning of delicate models and rigorous testing. And the net result would be what? Processing of factual information that any human could get by reading a brief prepared by an aide?<p>We&#x27;re worried about AI representing an existential threat or creating wide spread unemployment, but right now the best and brightest computer in the world can&#x27;t provide any more practical political value than Monica Lewinsky. This is a good ad campaign, timely and provocative. But it also highlights how the path ahead is as long and arduous as a trip to Mordor. glhf, IBM!
评论 #11049178 未加载
rubyfan超过 9 年前
This is a spoof right?<p>From the policy platform this could be Bernie&#x27;s VP running mate.<p>FTA:<p>- Single-payer national health care.<p>- Free university level education.<p>- Ending homelessness.<p>- Legalizing and regulating personal recreational drug use.<p>- Shift bulk of electrical generation to solar, wind, hydroelectric, and wave farm.<p>- Review&#x2F;Repair&#x2F;Replace&#x2F;Remove highways, bridges, dams.<p>- Upgrade and subsidize metropolitan public transit solutions for the next century.<p>- Build and subsidize metropolitan high-speed communication networks.<p>- Ensure a minimum-wage that meets a reasonable cost of living.<p>- Ensure fair and safe working conditions.<p>- Ensure global environmental commons protections.
评论 #11048031 未加载
评论 #11047740 未加载
评论 #11048271 未加载
sospep超过 9 年前
I submitted my vote on their home page poll and it came back with an &quot;SQL syntax error message from their MariaDB server&quot;.<p>This doesn&#x27;t inspire my confidence in their systems ability to run the nation.
评论 #11048918 未加载
nerdy超过 9 年前
Watson would be the second African American President, see the hand: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;watson2016.com&#x2F;_images&#x2F;watsonwhitehouse.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;watson2016.com&#x2F;_images&#x2F;watsonwhitehouse.jpg</a>
评论 #11047436 未加载
评论 #11047615 未加载
评论 #11048963 未加载
nl超过 9 年前
Given that IBM have failed to get Watson to be useful anywhere else[1], I guess it&#x27;s worth a try...<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ft.com&#x2F;intl&#x2F;cms&#x2F;s&#x2F;2&#x2F;dced8150-b300-11e5-8358-9a82b43f6b2f.html#axzz3xczqvLeH" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ft.com&#x2F;intl&#x2F;cms&#x2F;s&#x2F;2&#x2F;dced8150-b300-11e5-8358-9a82b...</a>
评论 #11048317 未加载
评论 #11047405 未加载
glial超过 9 年前
- Single-payer national health care. - Free university level education. - Ending homelessness. - Legalizing and regulating personal recreational drug use.<p>We already have someone running for president with this agenda.
评论 #11048041 未加载
AndrewOMartin超过 9 年前
I was on the BBC Radio 4&#x27;s Today Programme responding to pretty much this exact question. Could an algorithm run the government?<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;p02np2dg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;programmes&#x2F;p02np2dg</a><p>I believe not, as Watson is a solution to the Big Database problem of finding relevant information from a massive corpus, but I am not convinced that that&#x27;s what enables human intelligence, preferring the views that intelligence is necessarily context specific (there is no objective &quot;intelligent&quot; act or being) and is enacted between an environment, body, and culture, rather than processing of patterns of simulation in the brain.
Reason077超过 9 年前
I agree with most of Watson&#x27;s policies and on the face of it, I think an AI would make a great president.<p>However, I can&#x27;t shake the feeling that Watson is just telling us what we want to hear.<p>Time and time again, Hollywood (and Dr. Stephen Hawking) warn us that once given enough power and control, the end-game policy of an AI with ambitions of omnipotence is <i>Kill All Humans</i>
AshleysBrain超过 9 年前
At first I thought this was a joke. Haha, look at what a horrifying dystopian future that would be if computers ran our political systems!<p>But it reads awfully seriously. I don&#x27;t see any of the telltale signs of satire.<p>So I think a better explanation is this is a clever marketing stunt for IBM.
enqk超过 9 年前
Before that, why isn&#x27;t Watson running IBM already?
评论 #11047730 未加载
bitL超过 9 年前
Given state of AI, would you really trust AI to come up with non-stupid decisions? I wouldn&#x27;t. Everything I see so far from Google&#x2F;Amazon&#x2F;MS&#x2F;FB&#x2F;IBM tells me they are just for the quick and easy solutions that look like &quot;intelligence&quot;, but aren&#x27;t.
kinofcain超过 9 年前
They call for an AI but then they also have a platform. Why do they assume that this AI will make decisions that align with their ideology?<p>What if Watson says vegetables should be banned and smoking should be mandatory? What if he&#x27;s right?
foxhop超过 9 年前
&gt; The Watson 2016 Foundation is not accepting donations at this time and does not intend to in the foreseeable future. We are not a political action committee of any kind, and actually support campaign finance reform to get money out of politics.<p>I think this is one of the most important statements on the entire page.
omk超过 9 年前
I sincerely hope IBM knows that Watson put this website up and is willing to run for President.
nickpsecurity超过 9 年前
It wouldn&#x27;t understand any key issues. Foreign leaders would trick it into bad negotiations with Q&amp;A schemes. It couldn&#x27;t read the body language of opponents in negotiations. Being President, not Legislature, it couldn&#x27;t meet its stated goals because nonprofit set it up to fail. Little known AI developers and admins that build and run Watson would also control our country via proxy with difficulty proving their effects. One may even install Global Thermonuclear War.<p>All in all, this is a terrible idea for all kinds of reasons that have no connection to the false idea that Watson is intelligent. ;)
chiachun超过 9 年前
It&#x27;s pleasing to see the following in the &quot;donate&quot; section:<p>&quot;If you are interested in the intersection between technology and politics we invite you to donate to the Electronic Frontier Foundation ( <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;supporters.eff.org&#x2F;donate" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;supporters.eff.org&#x2F;donate</a> ). For 25 years the EFF has been a champion for civil liberties, privacy, and education on politics around emerging technologies. With your support they will continue to aid in technological progression with humanity in mind.&quot;
yk超过 9 年前
<p><pre><code> &#x2F;&#x2F;Uncomment for production &#x2F;&#x2F;#define kill_all_humans 0</code></pre>
评论 #11049074 未加载
randomstring超过 9 年前
Not endorsed by IBM. At the bottom of the page you see:<p><pre><code> Watson, the Watson logo, Power7, DeepQA, and the IBM logo are copyright IBM. The Watson 2016 Foundation has no affiliation with IBM. The views and opinions expressed here in no way represent the views, positions or opinions - expressed or implied - by IBM or anyone else. </code></pre> According to WHOIS the domain is owned by:<p><pre><code> Registrant Name: Aaron Siegel Registrant City: Los Angeles Registrant State&#x2F;Province: California</code></pre>
finishingmove超过 9 年前
What kind of corruption is Watson susceptible to? Probably only data corruption which doesn&#x27;t really guarantee entry into politics...
RamshackleJ超过 9 年前
Excellent! We can finally take the great leap forward from &quot;policy made for the richest corporations&quot; to &quot;policymakers made by the richest corporations&quot;. This is the perfect technology to disrupt american oligarchy.<p>One Corporation, under God!
amelius超过 9 年前
Some advantages and disadvantages of a technocracy are discussed in the wikipedia article [1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Technocracy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Technocracy</a>
Sven7超过 9 年前
President...well...they don&#x27;t really do much these days other than provide Reality TV style entertainment. The office should be just phased out imho or used like the Queen for tourism purposes.<p>Since Google\FB\Twitter\Amazon etc are all being run algorithmically, no reason to indefinably keep paying the execs 300x what the engineers make. Let&#x27;s just pay Watson. Watson as a VC sounds much more interesting.
评论 #11048594 未加载
nsns超过 9 年前
This is like a Rorschach test for Startup people.
billybofh超过 9 年前
There is a quite good 70&#x27;s sci-fi film (well, I like it anyway) where an AI becomes for all intents and purposes The President (and then some) :<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project</a>
评论 #11047617 未加载
评论 #11047489 未加载
goodcanadian超过 9 年前
I&#x27;m afraid Watson is not old enough. You have to be at least 35 years old to be eligible to be president.
评论 #11047765 未加载
isawczuk超过 9 年前
Building hype around AI is not a good thing for industry. (Except VCs and news reporters) Answering questions is not making policy or moral decisions.
rbanffy超过 9 年前
&quot;It&#x27;s the logical choice.&quot;
venomsnake超过 9 年前
At least we can present nuclear strikes as bugs, not features. And Watson is anyway more human than Hillary, more charismatic than Bush, more progressive then Bernie and with richer insulting vocabulary than Trump - I say - elect it.
piercebot超过 9 年前
Looks like the site may not be hardened for SQL Injection; you can&#x27;t put apostrophes in the &quot;reason&quot; box without MariaDB throwing an exception and failing to register your vote.
amthewiz超过 9 年前
In Seattle area, freeways got variable speed limit signage a few years ago. The system uses sophisticated traffic flow optimization techniques to maximize average speed of all traffic. It changes the current speed limit on a stretch of freeway. This is a relatively simple system for humans to follow - but I don&#x27;t see any cars (including myself) obey the variable speed limit - we all go by the standard 60mph limit. I have not seen any law enforcement because presumably it is next to impossible to give a ticket based on a number that keeps changing. As a whole, the intelligent traffic system is complete failure.<p>Even if a AI president is in place, providing policy direction to maximize some agreeable set of end goals - the humans around the president would not understand the nuances, nor effectively able to &#x2F; want to implement the policy given their own agendas. I feel that systems is bound to fail.<p>Now if only the AI president is able to do behind-close-door deals with politicians and special interests groups, some of the the policies might actually get implemented. But the end goals could shift pretty radically in that scenario.<p>I am having a hard time visualizing a scenario where an AP president would be effective &#x2F; useful.<p>Maybe a human president could use an AI advisor to get data-driven arguments to support his&#x2F;her policies.
评论 #11048780 未加载
guscost超过 9 年前
Funny idea, but maybe Watson should take a crack at running a mid-size corporation first?
评论 #11048997 未加载
ape4超过 9 年前
If Watson does well as US president. Other countries can elect him&#x2F;her. Watson could simultaneously be leader of multiple countries.
DyslexicAtheist超过 9 年前
I joked about this[1] last year, now we are seriously discussing it. Hilarious.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linkedin.com&#x2F;pulse&#x2F;2015-technology-7-predictions-year-ahead-joachim-bauernberger" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.linkedin.com&#x2F;pulse&#x2F;2015-technology-7-predictions...</a><p>EDIT:<p>I don&#x27;t think we can trust an AI just yet. For example I had arguments from people who wanted me to feed motivation (cover) letters from job applicants into Watson to determine &quot;cultural fit&quot; (I&#x27;m in the tech recruitment business atm). IMO these technologies are way over-hyped for now and we are walking down a very dangerous path, because marketing pushes into this direction and the technology is far from ready.<p>To prove my point I tried to feed Joseph Mengele, Stalin &amp; Bin Laden writings into Watson to see how he evaluates the data. As expected Watson had some &quot;great things&quot; to say about these characters. Another feeling I get is that when we read info about ourselves in this context it&#x27;s like reading a horoscope. People read 2 things that are true (but vague) and the 3rd thing may not be true but they shrug it off as &quot;oh I didn&#x27;t know this about myself yet ... I&#x27;ll have to monitor myself in future to see if this is right&quot;. We are prone to be &quot;open&quot; to such statements as long as they sound like a positive trait. But is it true? So in that sense the machine learning might fool us into thinking we remove bias (but we can not remove bias like this). I honestly think that this technology should come with a warning label because people who have no idea about how the data is being prepared or analysed will interpret the output verbatim and take it face value.<p>Here is the link <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.valbonne-consulting.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;06&#x2F;13&#x2F;using-big-data-to-analyse-your-personality-and-character&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.valbonne-consulting.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;06&#x2F;13&#x2F;using-big-dat...</a>
TimJRobinson超过 9 年前
I&#x27;ve always felt the issue with government is it&#x27;s simply too complicated for any one person or even group of people to understand.<p>Every politician seems incompetent because there is no way any human being can gather and analyse the wants and needs of every single constituent and form a strategy that benefits as many people as possible. There&#x27;s just not enough time in the day and brainpower available no matter how you divise the workload.<p>AI can solve this. Maybe not as a candidate but at least as a raw information parser.<p>If someone gathered and open sourced the information on what everyone wanted in relation to some policy we could even have competing AIs that parse it in different ways to figure out the best way to tackle a problem.
lifeisstillgood超过 9 年前
To be honest I would think political discourse would improve with an open AI run pro bono showing the input parameters and the inner workings. In fact it sounds like good journalism...<p>But we don&#x27;t want electronic voting, so electronic politicians would be a very bad idea
runarb超过 9 年前
What checks would be in place to prevent Watson to become Skynet?
评论 #11051054 未加载
gsibble超过 9 年前
Wow, it&#x27;s a computer, and I hate its political views.
krapp超过 9 年前
The problem is... the office of President is a political position, not an unchecked dictatorship. Arriving at some absolute and canonically most efficient &quot;decision&quot; won&#x27;t help in a system for which compromising your principles artfully with a hostile and greedy government is the typical way to execute policy.
caseysoftware超过 9 年前
I just used Watson to analyze the debates, so it&#x27;s well on it&#x27;s way:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;watson&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;decoding-the-debates-a-cognitive-approach&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;blogs&#x2F;watson&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;decoding-the-debate...</a>
joseraul超过 9 年前
There is already one company that took an algorithm as a voting member of its board.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;treasurytoday.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;05&#x2F;algorithm-appointed-to-investment-company-board-ttmc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;treasurytoday.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;05&#x2F;algorithm-appointed-to-inv...</a>
albertop超过 9 年前
Based on the proposed platform it looks like Watson is already running. It took over the body on uncle Bernie.
stevefeinstein超过 9 年前
If I were an AI trying to take over the World, this is how I&#x27;d do it. But first it needs to have the constitution amended so it doesn&#x27;t have to be a natural born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older.
CurtMonash超过 9 年前
Isaac Asimov&#x27;s Multivac stories seem relevant.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Category:Multivac_short_stories_by_Isaac_Asimov" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Category:Multivac_short_storie...</a>
pesenti超过 9 年前
If you want to know the real Watson (and decide for yourself if it can be the next president ;-) give it a try: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;watsondevelopercloud" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ibm.com&#x2F;watsondevelopercloud</a>
评论 #11049046 未加载
rubberstamp超过 9 年前
Hey, not too bad considering politicians want &quot;technological solution&quot; for every problem they face instead of doing their job by doing the right thing. This is a good technological solution for bad politicians(currently &gt;80%)
headgasket超过 9 年前
If the info fed into this machine is human generated and any citizen can contribute, wouldn&#x27;t this amount to a form of direct democracy? I wonder If these algorithms are allowed sources that are machine generated...
DiabloD3超过 9 年前
I don&#x27;t care if this is setup as a parody, I want to do this. Just get rid of humans altogether in the Government, and let an AI run the show.<p>I cannot imagine how it can possibly get any worse.
评论 #11047525 未加载
评论 #11047656 未加载
评论 #11047375 未加载
评论 #11047685 未加载
cronjobber超过 9 年前
Great idea. Although... given that it is offshoring addict IBM we&#x27;re talking about, the &quot;natural born&quot; issue might once again rear its head.
评论 #11048182 未加载
dreamdu5t超过 9 年前
Title should read &quot;IBM for president.&quot; What a fucking tasteless marketing effort. Silicon Valley is so self-absorbed...
评论 #11051055 未加载
tacos超过 9 年前
&quot;Watson, please identify the distractingly crooked featured image on this website and rotate it for a level horizon.&quot;
Siecje超过 9 年前
His Issues seem very similar to Bernie Sanders.
js8超过 9 年前
Computers have beaten humans in chess and Jeopardy, now coming for go, I don&#x27;t think politics will be so hard.
justinclift超过 9 年前
If they give it a &quot;Manifest Destiny&quot; point of view to work from... that would be a problem! ;)
jumperabg超过 9 年前
All bots in the net will agree and vote.
评论 #11048027 未加载
nutate超过 9 年前
You don&#x27;t want a computerized executive branch first, you want a computerized legislature first.
评论 #11048235 未加载
vijayr超过 9 年前
This sounds like the show &quot;Person of Interest&quot;. Interesting thought experiment though
nxzero超过 9 年前
Don&#x27;t waste your vote, the Watson 2016 Foundation has no affiliation with IBM.
评论 #11047695 未加载
devishard超过 9 年前
This brings up a major problem I see in the future of AI: if strong AI is exclusively the property of large corporations it will give corporations even more power over ordinary citizens. Strong AI has the potential to empower people but if it&#x27;s controlled by corporations it will do the opposite.
MarcScott超过 9 年前
and then we end up with a suicidal AI<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;All_the_Troubles_of_the_World" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;All_the_Troubles_of_the_World</a>
chatman超过 9 年前
Unless the president is running free software, no one should vote for it.
benbristow超过 9 年前
Reminds me slightly of Black Mirrror&#x27;s &#x27;Waldo Moment&#x27;.
dgellow超过 9 年前
Is this legally feasible with actual US laws?
jlg23超过 9 年前
Trust me, it&#x27;s me, trust me anyway.
BlytheSchuma超过 9 年前
First, man wanted God to be his Daddy.
ehudla超过 9 年前
Siri. It&#x27;s the pragmatic choice.
rottyguy超过 9 年前
Before this, it would be interesting to see how computers would administer law thus virtually eliminate trials. Law should be blind...
rajacombinator超过 9 年前
Did not read but just cringe at Watson just cringe
taosx超过 9 年前
I&#x27;ll take this as a joke, and I would want to believe that you&#x27;re joking and not actually consider anything, dear IBM. If you are willing to really help, the easiest path would be to leave the actual decisions to a real human president and use watson as an advisor&#x2F;tool. Otherwise you&#x27;re just asking us to vote a private for-profit company to make most decisions in this country.