TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chrome Will Drop SPDY Support on May 15

70 点作者 cujanovic超过 9 年前

5 条评论

Ambroos超过 9 年前
The larger issue is that together with SPDY support they will also drop NPN in favour of ALPN. This means that to provide HTTP&#x2F;2, server administrators will not only need a new version of Nginx (or their favourite webserver), but also OpenSSL 1.0.2.<p>The big problem with that is that currently no common server distributions provide an easy way to get OpenSSL 1.0.2. Many sites offer HTTP&#x2F;2 with NPN instead of ALPN right now. Those will no longer get HTTP&#x2F;2 in Chrome when SPDY and NPN are deprecated.<p>So, most web server administrators who do not want to deal with building their own OpenSSL&#x2F;Nginx&#x2F;... will have no choice but to drop SPDY and HTTP&#x2F;2 completely, or switch to a future distro that comes with OpenSSL 1.0.2 (Ubuntu 16.04 will be the first major one in a few months).<p>The deprecation of NPN should, in my opinion, be postponed a little more. While you can easily upgrade your webserver with upstream packages, usually, switching to a different OpenSSL version is way out of scope for most administrators. Debian will have a stable release with OpenSSL 1.0.2 late 2016 or early 2017, CentOS 8 will probably take even longer. And even then, few people will just switch their server operating systems. Instead of pushing people to HTTP&#x2F;2, deprecating NPN this soon will hurt adoption instead.
评论 #11086947 未加载
评论 #11086583 未加载
评论 #11087742 未加载
评论 #11086753 未加载
评论 #11086674 未加载
donatj超过 9 年前
This seems like a strange and arguably poor decision. One would think it would be in their interest to wait until HTTP&#x2F;2 had a foothold or at least until servers with support for it were included with common server OSs. I <i>can</i> install nginx without Yum, but I&#x27;d rather not.<p>I think this shows their true colors in a sense. Chrome and SPDY exist purely to save Google bandwidth. They don&#x27;t care about everyone else.
评论 #11088368 未加载
dbalan超过 9 年前
Original announcement: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.chromium.org&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;transitioning-from-spdy-to-http2.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.chromium.org&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;transitioning-from-spdy-to...</a>
raverbashing超过 9 年前
More worrying is that Chrome is dropping support for older versions of Mac OS X
评论 #11086770 未加载
评论 #11086604 未加载
dbalan超过 9 年前
Is there anything SPDY can do that http&#x2F;2 can&#x27;t now?
评论 #11086331 未加载