TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google's Super Bowl ad shows the need for search privacy

33 点作者 tdmackey超过 15 年前

5 条评论

arantius超过 15 年前
&#62; Microsoft's Bing is anonymizing this information after six months by deleting the entire Internet Protocol ("IP") address associated with your search queries. Google can and should anonymize search queries in the same way after six months or less.<p>FUD. 20 seconds of Googling shows me:<p>----------------------<p><a href="http://www.google.com/privacy_faq.html#toc-anonymize" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/privacy_faq.html#toc-anonymize</a> Why are search engine logs kept before being anonymized?<p>We strike a reasonable balance between the competing pressures we face, such as the privacy of our users, the security of our systems and the need for innovation. We believe anonymizing IP addresses after 9 months and cookies in our search engine logs after 18 months strikes the right balance.<p>----------------------<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2010/01/19/updates-to-bing-privacy.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2010/01/1...</a> Specifically, we are reducing the amount of time we store IP addresses from searchers to 6 months. Currently we keep that information for 18 months before we delete it. .. Then, after 18 months we take the additional step of deleting the IP address and any other cross session IDs associated with the query.<p>----------------------<p>"Cross session IDs"? What is that? Cookies? All cookies? In my mind, these policies are very equivalent. Google already does the same thing after six months. Probably the same thing at 18. Plus, Bing just announced this change a week or two ago.
评论 #1111427 未加载
avolkov超过 15 年前
I think that's cute. Google tries to be cool in their adds and I think they succeed at that, there's something close and personal(duh!) in every one of those.<p>Here's a direct link there are a few more to what already posted on eff website -- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/searchstories" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/searchstories</a>
dbz超过 15 年前
I apologize but I can't stand seeing a billion articles on this topic. Can anyone tell me why they care? It's not like Google is selling information to identity thieves.<p>Google can piece a life together? Cool! It's so big it wont know what to do with my life story; however, I'd love to see what it is (through my google searches) so far.
评论 #1112033 未加载
petercooper超过 15 年前
If someone wants to produce a great bit of linkbait, make a page where you do the "Google searches done through history" for various famous people like Bush, Hitler, Churchill, Ghandi, and so on. I'd read it!
评论 #1111536 未加载
Zilioum超过 15 年前
"...and its great that Google used this opportunity to illustrate the importance of search privacy to one of the world's largest audiences." I do not agree with this. I don't think that Google wanted to show us this, it rather is a negative side effect of this touching ad.