S.id

There are way <i>way</i> too many of these sites and frankly even just having one breaks the web. Look at this list of dead shorteners: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archiveteam.org&#x2F;index.php?title=URLTeam#Dead_or_Broken" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archiveteam.org&#x2F;index.php?title=URLTeam#Dead_or_Broke...</a> Imagine how many hyperlinks each takes with them when it dies and how many pages reference those links. Just stop it!

What is this? Clicked on the link browsing this site and looking at the landing page gives me no clue what this does and why I should care about this. There isn&#x27;t even a help page there.

Short domain, but stop with the background images. This design style is one of the reasons the internet still doesn&#x27;t seem faster after decades of improvement.<p>I would much prefer a ~4KB HTML page with no dependencies containing just<p><pre><code> &lt;form ...&gt;&lt;input name=&quot;url&quot;&#x2F;&gt;&lt;button&gt;Shorten&lt;&#x2F;button&gt;&lt;&#x2F;form&gt; </code></pre> The domain name is simple. Why not make the page the same way to demonstrate this for your service?

This is a url shortener made by PANDI [<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pandi.id" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pandi.id</a>], Indonesian .id (dot id) ccTLD.<p>Btw, they are opening anything.id right now, so you probably can search interesting domains like: humano.id, parano.id, etc.

Isn&#x27;t there hundreds of services that do this?

Every time the background image changed the entire page became unresponsive.