TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Go 1.7 toolchain improvements

248 点作者 spacey大约 9 年前

12 条评论

tptacek大约 9 年前
If you&#x27;re not a Go programmer, bear this in mind: the Go compiler got noticeably slower after 1.4, but it is still extraordinarily fast; &quot;run debounced after every keystroke&quot; fast; &quot;rebuild the world on a whim&quot; fast.<p>Personally, I think the Go community is a little unhealthily obsessed with this particular metric.
评论 #11411699 未加载
评论 #11412317 未加载
评论 #11411859 未加载
评论 #11411962 未加载
评论 #11411726 未加载
评论 #11412353 未加载
评论 #11411990 未加载
munificent大约 9 年前
There&#x27;s something vicariously gratifying about posts like this. Optimization is some of the most fun programming to do: you have a crystal clear objective goal to go for and once you&#x27;ve got a profiler set up it&#x27;s just:<p>1. Find slow thing.<p>2. Make faster.<p>3. See benchmark improve.<p>Some of the most satisfying coding I&#x27;ve done has been optimization.
评论 #11412596 未加载
评论 #11413392 未加载
hellcow大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m glad to see a return to improving compiling speed and binary sizes. Thank you to the Go team!
spriggan3大约 9 年前
- faster compilation times<p>- smaller binaries<p>good job.
评论 #11411860 未加载
lossolo大约 9 年前
You can find interesting details to this post in this thread:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;groups.google.com&#x2F;forum&#x2F;#!topic&#x2F;golang-dev&#x2F;DpMyPbclI3o" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;groups.google.com&#x2F;forum&#x2F;#!topic&#x2F;golang-dev&#x2F;DpMyPbclI...</a>
hacker_9大约 9 年前
I&#x27;m confused how Go can be paraded as a low level systems language, which improves performance via concurrency, and yet the graph says it&#x27;s compiler is still over twice as slow as when it was written in C?
评论 #11411120 未加载
评论 #11411395 未加载
评论 #11411275 未加载
评论 #11411117 未加载
评论 #11412037 未加载
评论 #11411182 未加载
评论 #11411172 未加载
ruffrey大约 9 年前
As someone new to the joys of golang, it is hard to imagine faster compile time or smaller binaries. It just keeps getting better.
评论 #11412112 未加载
RichWalton大约 9 年前
What happened between Go 1.4.3 and 1.5 which introduced such a slow down in compile times?
评论 #11411257 未加载
评论 #11411271 未加载
评论 #11411258 未加载
arktisklada大约 9 年前
As an avid go user, I&#x27;m excited about these improvements, especially the garbage colleciton
manojlds大约 9 年前
Can someone tell me why they went from C to Go despite the huge difference in compilation time?
评论 #11411092 未加载
评论 #11411098 未加载
评论 #11411789 未加载
montyedwards大约 9 年前
The only thing preventing me from using Go on Windows is lack of production quality cgo on Windows x86 and x64.<p>For example, using external linking should &quot;just work&quot; with recent versions of sqlite3 but it fails on Windows.
评论 #11411782 未加载
评论 #11412273 未加载
verytrivial大约 9 年前
(I went to high school with Dave. Hi, Dave! Signed, misc. Banyule Alumnus)